2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.903314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of autofocus measures for microscopy images of biopsy and cytology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a specific application, the election of a particular autofocus method will depend on two main aspects: the accuracy error and the computation time (see Redondo et al 6 for some preliminary results). Both criteria are important, but other features such as the number of local maxima, width of the focus curve or noise/illumination robustness can play a crucial role in automatic slide screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a specific application, the election of a particular autofocus method will depend on two main aspects: the accuracy error and the computation time (see Redondo et al 6 for some preliminary results). Both criteria are important, but other features such as the number of local maxima, width of the focus curve or noise/illumination robustness can play a crucial role in automatic slide screening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further investigate the performance of the proposed autofocusing algorithm, Brenner gradient (Redondo et al, ), variance (Liu et al, ), and our method are evaluated by using accuracy, width ratio, unimodality and dynamic range. The results with the average values by fifty measurements without image preprocessing under bright field are shown in Figure .…”
Section: The Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%