2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of archeothermometric methods in pottery using electron paramagnetic resonance spectra of iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, for the second group of samples (P and M), the value of the ratio Fe(III)/Fe(II) was definitively lower, ranging between 1 and 9 (median values 5 and 4 for site P and site M, respectively). This indicates a definitively higher concentration of Fe(II) than for the first group, which indicates technology using a lower ceramic firing temperature, with a definitively limited supply of oxidizing agent [ 32 ]. Importantly, the ceramic firing techniques, although characteristic of a given archaeological site, were unrelated to both the origin of the source material (clay) and the location of the site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, for the second group of samples (P and M), the value of the ratio Fe(III)/Fe(II) was definitively lower, ranging between 1 and 9 (median values 5 and 4 for site P and site M, respectively). This indicates a definitively higher concentration of Fe(II) than for the first group, which indicates technology using a lower ceramic firing temperature, with a definitively limited supply of oxidizing agent [ 32 ]. Importantly, the ceramic firing techniques, although characteristic of a given archaeological site, were unrelated to both the origin of the source material (clay) and the location of the site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated above [ 20 ], this indicated a higher ceramic firing temperature, as well as the presence of an oxidizing atmosphere during firing. For a smaller number of samples (41), the value of the Fe(III)/Fe(II) ratio was less than 20, indicating different firing conditions: a lower temperature and a reducing atmosphere [ 32 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%