“…On the other hand, for the second group of samples (P and M), the value of the ratio Fe(III)/Fe(II) was definitively lower, ranging between 1 and 9 (median values 5 and 4 for site P and site M, respectively). This indicates a definitively higher concentration of Fe(II) than for the first group, which indicates technology using a lower ceramic firing temperature, with a definitively limited supply of oxidizing agent [ 32 ]. Importantly, the ceramic firing techniques, although characteristic of a given archaeological site, were unrelated to both the origin of the source material (clay) and the location of the site.…”