2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of antibody-ELISA and real-time RT-PCR for the diagnosis and profiling of bluetongue virus serotype 8 during the epidemic in Belgium in 2006

Abstract: In 2006 bluetongue (BT) emerged for the first time in North-Western Europe. Reliable diagnostic tools are essential in controlling BT but data on the diagnostic sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) are often missing. This paper aims to describe and analyse the results obtained with the diagnostics used in Belgium during the 2006 BT crisis. The diagnosis was based on a combination of antibody detection (competitive ELISA, cELISA) and viral RNA detection by real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). The performance of the cEL… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All ELISA kits used were easy and quick to perform, especially the VMRD, ID VET and Pourquier taking about 1 hour to complete. The relative specificity of ID VET kit was similar to its performance reported by Vandenbussche et al (2008) and specificity of PrioCHECK and Pourquier kits was comparable to the earlier reported results (http://www.eavld2010.org, http://www.institut-pourquier.fr). Our results of analytical sensitivity of c-ELISAs evaluated on BTV "post-infection" sera correspond with the previously reported findings (Vandenbussche et al 2008, http://www.institut-pourquier.fr).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All ELISA kits used were easy and quick to perform, especially the VMRD, ID VET and Pourquier taking about 1 hour to complete. The relative specificity of ID VET kit was similar to its performance reported by Vandenbussche et al (2008) and specificity of PrioCHECK and Pourquier kits was comparable to the earlier reported results (http://www.eavld2010.org, http://www.institut-pourquier.fr). Our results of analytical sensitivity of c-ELISAs evaluated on BTV "post-infection" sera correspond with the previously reported findings (Vandenbussche et al 2008, http://www.institut-pourquier.fr).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The relative specificity of ID VET kit was similar to its performance reported by Vandenbussche et al (2008) and specificity of PrioCHECK and Pourquier kits was comparable to the earlier reported results (http://www.eavld2010.org, http://www.institut-pourquier.fr). Our results of analytical sensitivity of c-ELISAs evaluated on BTV "post-infection" sera correspond with the previously reported findings (Vandenbussche et al 2008, http://www.institut-pourquier.fr). Moreover, the c-ELISA was a superior to the other ELISA assays in the detection of anti-BTV antibody in the sera samples from cattle and sheep early after infection with BTV (Afshar et al 1987).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The cELISA was performed following manufacturer's instructions. Besides the kit controls, a twofold dilution series of an anti-BTV antibody positive reference serum was included and the results were expressed as % negativity (PN) as described by Vandenbussche et al (2008).…”
Section: Laboratory Analysis 251 Serological Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These samples were used to detect the levels of viraemia by real-time RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) according to Vandenbussche et al (2008). In order to amplify BTV genome, a RT-qPCR amplifying a region of BTV segment 5 (RT-qPCR_S5) was used (Toussaint et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Btv Detection In Biological Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk for vector transmission is highest in the peripheral quarters of the city and towards late summer (6). Besides, Buenos Aires, like other Latin American metropolitan areas, is undergoing demographic changes that convey further risk for mosquito-borne disease transmission, namely, accelerated population growth mainly caused by informal settlements, defi cient public health infrastructure and basic services, unregulated immigration from neighboring countries, and increased international mobility especially in or from neighboring countries (1).…”
Section: Indigenous Denguementioning
confidence: 99%