2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-6419(01)00033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of anisotropic yield functions for aluminum sheets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, considerable advances have been achieved during the last twenty years in the prediction of the sheet metal forming limits by employing yield criteria proposed to provide an improved description of plastic flow under conditions of biaxial loading. For instance, predictions in good agreement with experimental results have been obtained in the case of aluminum alloys [9][10] with the yield criteria proposed by Barlat et al 11 , Karafillis and Boyce 12 and Barlat et al 13 . The effects of the through-thickness normal and shear stress components have also been taken into account within the framework of the M-K model, see the recent works [14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Thus, considerable advances have been achieved during the last twenty years in the prediction of the sheet metal forming limits by employing yield criteria proposed to provide an improved description of plastic flow under conditions of biaxial loading. For instance, predictions in good agreement with experimental results have been obtained in the case of aluminum alloys [9][10] with the yield criteria proposed by Barlat et al 11 , Karafillis and Boyce 12 and Barlat et al 13 . The effects of the through-thickness normal and shear stress components have also been taken into account within the framework of the M-K model, see the recent works [14][15][16][17][18] .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Phenomenological plasticity theories consider initial anisotropy through a yield criterion. A number of such yield criterions has so far been proposed by Hill [18], Barlat et al [19,20], Karafillis and Boyce [21], Drucker [22], etc., and equally studies have been carried out to compare these yield functions, for instance [23][24][25][26][27]. Hill'48 yield function is widely used in finite element simulation studies and has been very useful for explaining some phenomena associated with anisotropic plasticity.…”
Section: Deformation Behaviour Of Blank Sheet Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mollica et al (2001) developed a general three dimensional model, which can reproduce the stress-strain response at loading reversals and can be applied to more general changes in loading direction. Deformation induced anisotropy, which leads to different subsequent deformations depending on the loading direction has also been investigated (Ishikawa, 1997;Ishikawa and Sasaki, 1998;Kalidindi, 2001;Yao and Cao, 2002;Tuğcu et al, 2002;Garmestani et al, 2002;Wu, 2002;Chiang et al, 2002;Geng et al, 2002;Wu et al, 2003;Kowalczyk and Gambin, 2004;Tsakmakis, 2004;Häusler et al, 2004;Bron and Besson, 2004;Vincent et al, 2004;Cazacu and Barlet, 2004;Kuwabara et al, 2005;Wu et al, 2005;Barlet et al, 2005). Kalidindi (2001) reviewed and summarized models of anisotropic strain hardening and deformation textures in low stacking fault energy fcc metals and reported a new approach in modeling the deformation behavior of the materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%