2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2009.01.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an immunoassay for human-specific quantitation of therapeutic antibodies in serum samples from non-human primates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative IgG1 expression ELISA. IgG1 expression in cell culture supernatants was determined by sandwich ELISA using a mouse anti-human IgG (clone R10Z8E9) 76 capture antibody and the same antibody as biotin conjugate for detection with streptavidin-AP and AttoPhos (Roche). Relative IgG1 expression levels were calculated by dividing the signal of the respective VH/VL pair through the signal of the reference IgG1 antibody MOR03080.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relative IgG1 expression ELISA. IgG1 expression in cell culture supernatants was determined by sandwich ELISA using a mouse anti-human IgG (clone R10Z8E9) 76 capture antibody and the same antibody as biotin conjugate for detection with streptavidin-AP and AttoPhos (Roche). Relative IgG1 expression levels were calculated by dividing the signal of the respective VH/VL pair through the signal of the reference IgG1 antibody MOR03080.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total mAb concentrations were measured with a generic enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (18). The assay was performed in streptavidincoated 96 well microplates using biotinylated and digoxigenylated mouse monoclonal anti-human Fcγ antibodies as capture and detection reagents.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The use of an antibody specific for human IgG is also generic and applicable to animal but not to human samples [15,24]. As these approaches demand enormous binding capacities, they appear rather limited for efficient removal of anti-A2V.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Anti-id-anti-vegf Mab Capturing In Comparison mentioning
confidence: 99%