2016
DOI: 10.1024/1016-264x/a000191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of an Executive Functioning Test Battery in Two Versions with Material Close to Daily Life

Abstract: Abstract. The assessment of executive functions (EF) often yields conflicting results between standardized tests and self-ratings (e. g., in depression or adult ADHD). For the present investigation, standardized EF-tasks were enriched in order to better represent executive demands of daily life. In the future this may improve the assessment and prediction of reported performance deficits in daily life. An EF-test battery was designed with material close to daily life; tasks were matched to basic executive func… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two assessments took place, separated by 1 week (standard vs. experimental condition). Every session consisted of a complex planning task (“ Tour-/Routenplaner ”: Arling, Grossmann, Palme, & Spijkers, 2011 ) and four newly constructed EF-tasks ( Kallweit & Exner, 2016 ). In a prestudy with healthy subjects, each task had been constructed and evaluated in two versions (music vs. sport); comparability, reliability, and validity had been reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Two assessments took place, separated by 1 week (standard vs. experimental condition). Every session consisted of a complex planning task (“ Tour-/Routenplaner ”: Arling, Grossmann, Palme, & Spijkers, 2011 ) and four newly constructed EF-tasks ( Kallweit & Exner, 2016 ). In a prestudy with healthy subjects, each task had been constructed and evaluated in two versions (music vs. sport); comparability, reliability, and validity had been reported.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The order of the versions and conditions was counterbalanced across participants. Product Order did not include an experimental manipulation, and the “ Tour-/Routenplaner ” ( Arling et al, 2011 ) was not satisfactorily comparable for analysis (see Kallweit & Exner, 2016 ). Therefore, they have not been included in this article.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation