2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2004.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of air traffic management procedures—safety assessment in an experimental environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, failure independence would increase the overall ATM safety. -Humans [12,30] using complex language and procedures mediate this interaction. Moreover, most of the final decisions are still demanded to humans whose behaviour is less predictable than that of automated systems.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, failure independence would increase the overall ATM safety. -Humans [12,30] using complex language and procedures mediate this interaction. Moreover, most of the final decisions are still demanded to humans whose behaviour is less predictable than that of automated systems.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A vast variety of solutions from early methods such as network theory 7 and cut and try methods 8 to more complicated approaches such as heuristic methods have been proposed over the years, each with their loss and gain. Some such as the cutand-try method has shown to have great dependency on r. Rather than designing the ATC system itself, the dependability and safety assessment applications must be thoroughly studied 9 . In 10 , dependability evaluations have been done on the automatic CAUTRA air traffic system deployed on the France airways.…”
Section: Co-published By Atlantis Press and Taylor And Francismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans [19,20] using complex language and procedures mediate this interaction. Moreover, most of the final decisions are still demanded to humans whose behaviour is less predictable than that of automated systems.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%