2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of age-friendly guidelines for public buses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
86
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps, the measures had already successfully maintained their public transport use and social activity participation. As referred to the experience in Queensland (Broome et al, 2013), the implementation of age-friendly guidelines for public buses resulted in improved satisfaction with the bus system and prevented declining in ease of bus use. During the interviews, most of the respondents expressed concerns about the provision of priority seats.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps, the measures had already successfully maintained their public transport use and social activity participation. As referred to the experience in Queensland (Broome et al, 2013), the implementation of age-friendly guidelines for public buses resulted in improved satisfaction with the bus system and prevented declining in ease of bus use. During the interviews, most of the respondents expressed concerns about the provision of priority seats.…”
Section: Socio-demographic Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, public transport services are considered unreliable due to lack of provision during off-peak times (e.g., weekend or holidays). Moreover, older people report dissatisfaction with the locations of stops, punctuality and waiting times and poor connectivity with other buses and/or transport modes [5,41,43,47,49,51,54,63,68,69,81,84]. This was found particularly valid for suburban or rural areas [18,35,41].…”
Section: Public Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problems identified by the older population are linked to boarding and alighting from vehicles [88]. The ability to get on and off, as well as sometimes having to stand, are seen as key reasons for the lack of public transport usage [23,47,50,51,53,63,68,69,77]. Despite improvements to accessibility including the introduction of low-floor buses, there are a variety of obstacles that hinder the less mobile.…”
Section: Public Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for these indicators can most often be sourced from public access data portals, Open Street Map or General Transit Feed Specification (GTFS) where public transport data are provided by transport agencies into a computer readable format for web developers [ 70 ]. Gaining access to more detailed data describing public transport that meets Disability Standards is another very valid indicator and has been associated with increased satisfaction and perceived useability in older people [ 71 ]. Similarly, access to a bus stop with an accompanying shelter and seat is also important for older people’s mobility, as well as dropped curves, footpaths, and pedestrian signals [ 54 ].…”
Section: Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%