2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of advanced anisotropic models with mixed hardening for general associated and non-associated flow metal plasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stoughton and Yoon (2009) proposed a non-AFR based anisotropic hardening model that resulted in excellent predictions of hardening curves for rolling, transverse and diagonal directions and for the balanced biaxial stress state. Improvements in prediction of cup height and springback of a U-bend specimen using non-AFR with mixed isotropic-kinematic hardening have been also reported by Taherizadeh et al (2010Taherizadeh et al ( , 2011. Gao et al (2011) showed the significance of the hydrostatic stress on plastic response with the non-associated flow rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Stoughton and Yoon (2009) proposed a non-AFR based anisotropic hardening model that resulted in excellent predictions of hardening curves for rolling, transverse and diagonal directions and for the balanced biaxial stress state. Improvements in prediction of cup height and springback of a U-bend specimen using non-AFR with mixed isotropic-kinematic hardening have been also reported by Taherizadeh et al (2010Taherizadeh et al ( , 2011. Gao et al (2011) showed the significance of the hydrostatic stress on plastic response with the non-associated flow rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In this forming process, the plastic anisotropy has important effect on the formation of undulative top edge of the finally drawn cup often termed as earing. Numerous phenomenological orthotropic yield functions with constant (fixed) anisotropy parameters under associated or non-associated flow rule have been tested in this forming process (Yoon et al, 1998(Yoon et al, , 1999(Yoon et al, , 2000Cvitanić et al, 2008;Taherizadeh et al, 2010Taherizadeh et al, , 2011Park and Chung, 2012;Safaei et al, 2013;Vrh et al, 2014;and others). These extensive numerical studies clearly indicate that the predicted earing trend (location of peaks and valleys) is the mirror image of the predicted r-value trend with the respect to the transverse direction, and that the prediction of the earing profile amplitude (the maximum difference in cup heights) is correlated to the prediction of the yield stress anisotropy amplitude.…”
Section: Latin American Journal Of Solids and Structures 14 (2017) 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various anisotropic yield functions have been proposed to describe the anisotropic deformation behavior of materials. Among them, the quadratic anisotropic yield function (Hill48 yield function) proposed by Hill [5] is the most famous and is widely used because of its simple mathematical expression [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, the Hill48 quadratic yield function can only explain four test results, and the results of the "abnormal" yield behavior observed in some processes involving rolled sheet metals cannot be reasonably described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%