2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of adhesive properties of three resilient denture liners by the modified peel test method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These researchers believed that the “lifting force” for a stiffer material was more likely to cause debonding because the stress was transferred to the interface area, while for a softer material, this force was more likely to deform the soft lining elastically and leave the interface area intact. A similar tendency for the same three SLTSDL materials in the peel test was observed by Tanimoto et al [85]; however, after 30 additional days of water storage, lower peel resistance was recorded. Machado et al [86] observed that the peel bond strength of two autopolymerized SLTSDLs was not affected by microwave disinfection.…”
Section: The Bond Strength To Denture Base Polymerssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These researchers believed that the “lifting force” for a stiffer material was more likely to cause debonding because the stress was transferred to the interface area, while for a softer material, this force was more likely to deform the soft lining elastically and leave the interface area intact. A similar tendency for the same three SLTSDL materials in the peel test was observed by Tanimoto et al [85]; however, after 30 additional days of water storage, lower peel resistance was recorded. Machado et al [86] observed that the peel bond strength of two autopolymerized SLTSDLs was not affected by microwave disinfection.…”
Section: The Bond Strength To Denture Base Polymerssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Thus, more laboratory time and extra costs are needed so as to construct dentures with permanent soft lining related to the equipment and materials used. Hence, an adequate bond between the denture base and the soft lining material is necessary 4,6,7,17,18. Previous studies17,19,20 have showed that Molloplast-B soft lining material (Detax, Karl Huber GmbH and Co., KG, Ettlingen, Germany) is one of the preferred materials for long-term clinical use because of its low water absorption and solubility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As silicone rubber materials do not adhere well to acrylic denture base resins, primers and finishing materials are used to induce adherence. However, the life expectancy of these materials is typically only a few months 5,6) . One of the aims of this study was to increase the durability of soft lining materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The silicone rubber lining materials in use at present, however, do not adhere well to acrylic denture base resins. Thus, primers and finishing materials are used to induce adherence, although the durability of these materials is poor 5,6) . Riggs et al 7) proposed new soft lining materials composed of a butadiene/styrene copolymer gelled with methacrylate, but these materials exhibit high water uptake and signs of oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%