2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Actual vs Expected Photodynamic Therapy Spot Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study in humans shows a significant relationship between spot size and type of laser used [7], but the sample size was not powered to demonstrate a significant relationship between spot size and axial length of the treated eyes. However, the observation that different laser units seem to have different actual laser spot sizes at the same spot size setting is of interest, as it results in different laser fluence rates delivered to the retina [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A previous study in humans shows a significant relationship between spot size and type of laser used [7], but the sample size was not powered to demonstrate a significant relationship between spot size and axial length of the treated eyes. However, the observation that different laser units seem to have different actual laser spot sizes at the same spot size setting is of interest, as it results in different laser fluence rates delivered to the retina [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Conversely, an oversized treatment may destroy more healthy tissue than necessary. 4 In the treatment of age-related macular degeneration with photodynamic therapy (TAP) study, 5,6 it was considered necessary to include features that may obscure the boundaries or extent of either classic or occult CNV when deciding on treatment spot size. These features included hypofluorescence corresponding to blood, hypofluorescence not corresponding to blood, hyperfluorescence from fibrous tissue showing fluorescein staining, and hyperfluorescence from a serous pigment epithelial detachment (PED), identified on fluorescein angiography (FA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%