2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Accuracy and Precision of Manual Size Measurements in Chest Tomosynthesis using Simulated Pulmonary Nodules

Abstract: The results suggest a high accuracy and precision for manual measurements of the nodules in chest tomosynthesis images. However, small nodules (<5.0 mm) may be difficult to measure at all because of poor visibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the effect was largest for growths corresponding to a volume increase of up to 37%. Results from a previous study showed that the absolute intraobserver variability of nodule diameter measurements in chest tomosynthesis images were of similar magnitude for nodules ranging in diameter from approximately 4À12 mm (23). These results indicate that, for a given relative nodule volume increase, the detection rate of nodule growth will decrease with the nodule size but that the effect would decrease with increasing nodule growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…In the present study, the effect was largest for growths corresponding to a volume increase of up to 37%. Results from a previous study showed that the absolute intraobserver variability of nodule diameter measurements in chest tomosynthesis images were of similar magnitude for nodules ranging in diameter from approximately 4À12 mm (23). These results indicate that, for a given relative nodule volume increase, the detection rate of nodule growth will decrease with the nodule size but that the effect would decrease with increasing nodule growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Size estimation and, consequently, precision of size measurements is the main factor that decides whether a nodule should be recommended for follow-up. This study defines the reference truth regarding follow-up according to manual size measurements at CT. A previous study (36) reported variability in nodule size measurements up to 0.8 mm at DTS, and although Johnsson et al (37) found no evident bias between measurements of longest diameter at DTS…”
Section: Disclosures Of Conflicts Ofmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, the non-anatomical background restricted the clinical validity of the results. Söderman et al ( 19 ) addressed this issue by placing artificial ellipsoid-shaped nodules with known sizes in clinical chest tomosynthesis images. A similar approach was used in a study by Shim et al ( 20 ) , in which model nodules with known sizes were placed in an anthropomorphic chest phantom.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The true sizes of the nodules were, however, not known. Limitations with chest tomosynthesis, in terms of low nodule visibility and decreased nodule size measurement accuracy, was identified by Söderman et al ( 19 ) for nodules at positions in the lung corresponding to locations in low dose areas of the acquired tomosynthesis projection radiographs. This was particularly evident for nodules located behind the heart or the diaphragm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%