2014
DOI: 10.1002/we.1817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a wind speed estimator for effective hub-height and shear components

Abstract: Estimates of the effective wind speed disturbances acting on a wind turbine are useful in a variety of control applications. With some simplifications, it is shown that for zero yaw error, any wind field interacting with a turbine can be equivalently described using a hub-height (uniform) component as well as linear horizontal and vertical shear components. A Kalman filter-based wind speed estimator is presented for estimation of these effective hub-height and shear components. The wind speed estimator is eval… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For estimation of U ∞ in above-rated conditions, one may, for example, require the 15 implementation of a wind speed estimator on each individual turbine, from which the local wind speed in front of each turbine can be estimated, as demonstrated by Simley and Pao (2016) Combining these elements yields an efficient, modular, and accurate model calibration solution for low-and medium-fidelity dynamic wind farm models. The natural model states are estimated using SCADA and/or LIDAR data inside a wind farm, of which the former is readily available, and the latter becoming more popular.…”
Section: Synthesizing An Online Model Calibration Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For estimation of U ∞ in above-rated conditions, one may, for example, require the 15 implementation of a wind speed estimator on each individual turbine, from which the local wind speed in front of each turbine can be estimated, as demonstrated by Simley and Pao (2016) Combining these elements yields an efficient, modular, and accurate model calibration solution for low-and medium-fidelity dynamic wind farm models. The natural model states are estimated using SCADA and/or LIDAR data inside a wind farm, of which the former is readily available, and the latter becoming more popular.…”
Section: Synthesizing An Online Model Calibration Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of these models have shown success in wind tunnel tests (e.g., Schreiber et al, 2017) and field tests (e.g., Fleming et al, 2017a, b) for power maximization, the actuation frequency is limited to the minutes-scale, since the flow and turbine dynamics are predicted on the minute-scale. Furthermore,5 time-ahead predictions with these models are limited to the time-invariant steady-state, limiting their use for APC. 1 There is a smaller yet significant number of dynamic surrogate wind farm models (e.g., Munters and Meyers, 2017;Boersma et al, 2017b;Shapiro et al, 2017a), which attempt to model the dominant temporal dynamics inside the farm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In principle, the resulting input-output relationship should also include the dependency on other parameters, such as blade pitch and rotor speed, as shown for example in Simley and Pao (2014). However, all these quantities depend in turn on the environmental and operating conditions according to the particular regulation strategy adopted by the onboard controller.…”
Section: Blade Load Harmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in this work the model is assumed to depend only on θ , V and . Vector θ is to be estimated with the proposed observer, while V , which is a scheduling parameter for the model, can either be measured or observed using a rotor-equivalent wind speed estimator (Soltani et al, 2013;Simley and Pao, 2014;Bottasso et al, , 2018. This approach leads to a white box model, i.e., a model using analytical formulas to express relationships among the relevant variables based on physical principles (Ljung, 2010).…”
Section: Blade Load Harmonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation