2014
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2014.962786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a two-phase experimental study of a small group (“MultiLit”) reading intervention for older low-progress readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although originally designed to be used one-on-one in clinical settings, FRIENDS for Life has been shown to be effective in schools when delivered to groups by an appropriately trained professional such as a psychologist or counsellor. Another evidence-based program widely used in schools is MultiLit, a reading intervention that has been evaluated in a series of studies by the program's developers (see, e.g., Buckingham, Beaman, & Wheldall, 2012; Wheldall & Wheldall, 2014). Significant improvements in aspects of literacy such as decoding, fluency, comprehension, and confidence have been demonstrated.…”
Section: Evidence-based Interventions In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although originally designed to be used one-on-one in clinical settings, FRIENDS for Life has been shown to be effective in schools when delivered to groups by an appropriately trained professional such as a psychologist or counsellor. Another evidence-based program widely used in schools is MultiLit, a reading intervention that has been evaluated in a series of studies by the program's developers (see, e.g., Buckingham, Beaman, & Wheldall, 2012; Wheldall & Wheldall, 2014). Significant improvements in aspects of literacy such as decoding, fluency, comprehension, and confidence have been demonstrated.…”
Section: Evidence-based Interventions In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%