2016
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2343
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Myopic Normative Database for Analysis of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cirrus HD-OCT provides a built-in normative database comprised of 271 healthy individuals with a mean spherical equivalence of À0.82 6 1.96 D. 34 The low proportion of myopic eyes in the internal normative database is likely to be related to the high rates of false-positive errors in myopic eyes. 10,35 In the present study, the rate of false-positive errors (P < 1%) for RNFL thickness was significantly higher in high myopia (62.8%) than mild-to- Statistically significant values are shown in bold. * NA, Correction is undefined for curves below the diagonal: uncorrected pAUC < the value of the nondiscriminant AUC (with an AUC of 0.5 or 50) in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cirrus HD-OCT provides a built-in normative database comprised of 271 healthy individuals with a mean spherical equivalence of À0.82 6 1.96 D. 34 The low proportion of myopic eyes in the internal normative database is likely to be related to the high rates of false-positive errors in myopic eyes. 10,35 In the present study, the rate of false-positive errors (P < 1%) for RNFL thickness was significantly higher in high myopia (62.8%) than mild-to- Statistically significant values are shown in bold. * NA, Correction is undefined for curves below the diagonal: uncorrected pAUC < the value of the nondiscriminant AUC (with an AUC of 0.5 or 50) in the region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…[5][6][7] Nonetheless, myopia is notorious for causing false-positive errors on the OCT-measured RNFL thickness map. 4,[8][9][10] This phenomenon can be attributed to (1) vessel temporalization during myopic axial elongation, which can affect the peak distribution of RNFL thickness, [11][12][13] (2) inherent measurement errors in eyes with myopic refraction or longer axial lengths (AXL), due to the OCT magnification effect [14][15][16] , and (3) OCT scan-circle misalignment on the optic disc. 17,18 Kim et al 19 warned that greater AXL and smaller disc area is significantly associated with false-positive red signs in cases of SD-OCT-measured RNFL thickness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mathematical solution may approximate true expected RNFL thickness values, but an empirical OCT normative database for eyes with high myopia, as suggested by Biswas et al, 2 would address the problem directly. The use and utility of OCT are high.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The superotemporal and inferotemporal RNFL bundles angle decreases with increasing myopia 21 and the application of the OCT normative data would decrease the specificity for detection of RNFL abnormalities in eyes with myopia. 22 Another limitation of the Spectralis OCT is the lack of topographic analysis of the RNFLT. The discriminating power of the circumpapillary RNFLT diagnostic classification is inferior to the analysis of RNFL thickness deviation map (6×6 mm 2 ) for glaucoma detection.…”
Section: Clinical Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%