2004
DOI: 10.1128/cdli.11.4.799-800.2004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a Monoclonal Antibody-Based Test for Detection of Helicobacter pylori -Specific Antigen in Stool Samples from Mice

Abstract: A test using monoclonal antibodies for detection of antigen in stool samples was compared with culture and histology for noninfected (n ‫؍‬ 25), Helicobacter pylori-infected (n ‫؍‬ 25), and Helicobacter felis-infected (n ‫؍‬ 6) mice. Sensitivity and specificity were 96%. The monoclonal antibody-based test is therefore a noninvasive technique that is able to diagnose H. pylori infection in mice.Mice infected with Helicobacter pylori are a convenient animal model for investigations (5, 6); however, noninvasive t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific and direct detection of bacteria using monoclonal antibody and aptamer as recognition receptors immobilized covalently onto functionalized interface of biosensor or biochip are widespread developed. However, the application of aptamer [12]based elements suffers from the limitation of discrimination between viable and dead pathogen, while for monoclonal antibody [3,6,13,14]-based recognition elements, the limitation are expensive cost, susceptibility to natural/human environmental stresses and cross-binding to other pathogen, which may cause several positive results [15][16][17]. Compared to monoclonal antibody and aptamer, bacteriophages are not uncommon in natural environment, relative highly specific to pathogen and thus harmless to human health, much less complicated technique to prepare than antibodies or aptamer, and show a far longer shelf life at room temperature [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific and direct detection of bacteria using monoclonal antibody and aptamer as recognition receptors immobilized covalently onto functionalized interface of biosensor or biochip are widespread developed. However, the application of aptamer [12]based elements suffers from the limitation of discrimination between viable and dead pathogen, while for monoclonal antibody [3,6,13,14]-based recognition elements, the limitation are expensive cost, susceptibility to natural/human environmental stresses and cross-binding to other pathogen, which may cause several positive results [15][16][17]. Compared to monoclonal antibody and aptamer, bacteriophages are not uncommon in natural environment, relative highly specific to pathogen and thus harmless to human health, much less complicated technique to prepare than antibodies or aptamer, and show a far longer shelf life at room temperature [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%