Evaluation of a mobile IPv6-based architecture supporting user mobility QoS and AAAC in heterogeneous networks

Marques, Victor; Costa, Xavier Pérez; Aguiar, Rui L.; Liebsch, Marco; Duarte, A. Manuel de Oliveira

doi:10.1109/jsac.2005.856825

Cited by 12 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, CoA pre-configuration is introduced in the extensions to reduce the handover delay inherent to MIPv6. Ultimately, these extensions are beneficial in real-time environments for achieving seamless handover [22]. These extensions are discussed next.…”

Section: Mobile Ipv6 (Mipv6)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Handover approaches for seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks

Magagula¹,

Chan²,

Falowo³

2011

Wireless Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Next generation wireless networks (NGWN) will be an integration of heterogeneous wireless access networks that will interwork over an IP-based infrastructure. This all-IP vision has led to the development of handover mechanisms to support seamless mobility for active network services among the different interworking wireless networks in order to ensure network access ubiquity in NGWN. These handover mechanisms need to ensure that mobile devices continue to receive ongoing communication without any noticeable disruption during handover events among the heterogeneous networks. This paper gives a qualitative and quantitative review of current handover approaches of IP mobility management protocols for NGWN with an objective to introduce a new way of further optimizing the handover performance. In particular, the paper focuses on handover approaches of mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) based mobility management protocols. Thus, the need, benefits, and limitations of these handover approaches are explored. Thereafter, dynamic handover coordination is introduced as a new viable solution that exploits the benefits and mitigates the limitations of these handover approaches hence improving handover performance in terms of handover delay, packet loss, and signaling overhead.Notably though is that the movement detection signaling is exchanged between the MH and the MAP as opposed to MH and AR as is the case in FMIPv6 and HMIPv6, hence the delays encountered are different. MIPV6 RELATED NETWORK-BASED MOBILITY MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLSContrary to host-based mobility management protocols, in network-based mobility management the MH is not involved in any mobility-related signaling. In fact, a network element or proxy agent performs all the mobilityrelated signaling on behalf of the MH. The most common L. A. Magagula et al.Seamless mobility management

show abstract

Section: Mobile Ipv6 (Mipv6)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Handover approaches for seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks

Magagula¹,

Chan²,

Falowo³

2011

Wireless Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Mobile IP (MIP) is a well known mobility solution [5] which has been built-on in numerous works (e.g. [6], [7]). Because MIP introduces a fixed anchor point which is topologically fixed it suffers from strong routing inefficiencies.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

ARA: A Routing and Forwarding Scheme for Coordinated Wide Area Mobility

Neumann

Zhang

2010

2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The wide availability of WiFi hot-spots provides mobile users with convenient access to the Internet. However, hot-spots cover only small areas and are often operated by a local authority. A user that roams between hot-spots effectively traverses different operators and access networks. Due to deployment complexity, IP mobility is usually not supported by the mobile node or the network.In this paper we propose an approach that enables access routers to provide seamless mobility support without any changes to the mobile node or other network entities. Our approach provides a simple, flexible, and deployable framework for mobility support and scales well with the number of involved access routers. By simulation and mathematical analysis, we show that even with lower deployment requirements and less support from the network, our approach performs well in terms of routing stretch, handover latency, and signaling overhead.

show abstract

“…Main concern in [13] is about the QoS and AAA mechanisms over heterogeneous wireless access networks with MobileIP. In [14] they propose the procedure for achieving AAA in MobileIPv6/NEMO environment.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management for Mobility-Aware Networks Based on Standardized Protocols

Koide

Maruyama

Keeni

et al. 2009

2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the traditional network management architecture, there is an implicit assumption that a managed device will not change its location. Location related information where available is static, and it is used for simple reporting purposes. However with mobile devices these attributes are inherently dynamic. Monitoring processes of management information also encounter difficulties of network instability caused by roaming of devices or wireless signal errors. So the current approach of network management needs to be reviewed. MobileIPv6 and NEMO are standardized protocols for realizing mobility-aware network. In this article we propose new network management technologies for MobileIPv6/NEMO network based on the Internet standard network management protocol, Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Our focus is the importance of 1) location awareness and 2) intelligent monitoring process. We explained about the MobileIPv6/NEMO-MIB that is aware of mobile device's dynamically changing location. We also propose the delayed data sending method that realizes effective transfer of management information without congestion over an instable network. From an evaluation in simulations, and experiments in real environment, we confirmed that our approach is effective for improving monitoring processes for mobile devices in management of MobileIPv6/NEMO network. This is one of the first management applications that are completely based on Internet standard protocols of MobileIPv6/NEMO, and SNMP.

show abstract

Evaluation of a mobile IPv6-based architecture supporting user mobility QoS and AAAC in heterogeneous networks

Cited by 12 publications

References 13 publications

Handover approaches for seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks

Handover approaches for seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks

ARA: A Routing and Forwarding Scheme for Coordinated Wide Area Mobility

Management for Mobility-Aware Networks Based on Standardized Protocols

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About