Evaluation of a laparoscopic training program with or without robotic assistance

Letouzey, V.; Huberlant, S.; Faillie, J.L.; Prudhomme, Mathilde; Mares, P.; Tayrac, Renaud de

doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.003

Cited by 7 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our study, nonetheless, showed a strong tendency for all groups to learn and perform better even considering only five repetitions of the same task. This fact was also observed by others 21 and it may show a real quick learning characteristic of robotic surgery.…”

Section: Differences Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Learning Curvessupporting

confidence: 81%

Influence of Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Experience Skills on Robotic Surgery Dexterity

Belotto

Coutinho

Pacheco³

et al. 2021

ABCD, arq. bras. cir. dig.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It is unclear if there is a natural transition from laparoscopic to robotic surgery with transfer of abilities. Aim: To measure the performance and learning of basic robotic tasks in a simulator of individuals with different surgical background. Methods: Three groups were tested for robotic dexterity: a) experts in laparoscopic surgery (n=6); b) experts in open surgery (n=6); and c) non-medical subjects (n=4). All individuals were aged between 40-50 years. Five repetitions of four different simulated tasks were performed: spatial vision, bimanual coordination, hand-foot-eye coordination and motor skill. Results: Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed similar to non-medical individuals and better than experts in open surgery in three out of four tasks. All groups improved performance with repetition. Conclusion: Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed better than other groups but almost equally to non-medical individuals. Experts in open surgery had worst results. All groups improved performance with repetition.

show abstract

Section: Differences Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Learning Curvessupporting

confidence: 81%

Influence of Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Experience Skills on Robotic Surgery Dexterity

Belotto

Coutinho

Pacheco³

et al. 2021

ABCD, arq. bras. cir. dig.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Our study, nonetheless, showed a strong tendency for all groups to learn and perform better even considering only 5 repetitions of the same task. This fact was also observed by others [12] and it may show a real quick learning characteristic of robotic surgery.…”

Section: Differences Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Learning Curvessupporting

confidence: 81%

“…We did not analyze mathematically the numbers due to the low statistical power for sub-analysis in a small population, but excessive force use was common in almost all participants from all 3 groups. Different previous studies in simulators showed similar performance in the execution of basic tasks for experienced laparoscopic surgeons and individuals in training (medical students or residents) [10][11][12]. The same was observed when experts in open surgery were compared to novices [10,13].…”

Section: Differences Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Learningsupporting

confidence: 71%

Influence of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery experience in minimally invasive robotic surgery dexterity

Belotto¹,

Coutinho²,

Moricz³

et al. 2021

Sur Res J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: It is unclear if there is a natural transition from robotic to laparoscopic surgery with transfer of abilities. This study aims to measure the performance and learning of basic robotic tasks in a simulator of individuals with different surgical background. Method: Three groups were tested for robotic dexterity: (a) experts in laparoscopic surgery (n=6), (b) experts in open surgery (n=6), and (c) non-medical subjects (n=4). All individuals were aged between 40 -50 years. Five repetitions of 4 different simulated tasks were performed: spatial vision, bimanual coordination, hand-foot-eye coordination and motor skill. Results: Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed similar to non-medical individuals and better than experts in open surgery in 3 out of 4 tasks. All groups improved performance with repetition. Conclusions: Experts in laparoscopic surgery performed better than other groups but almost equally to non-medical individuals. Experts in open surgery had worst results. All groups improved performance with repetition.

show abstract

“…Training programs are increasingly used among busy clinicians to teach and practice new skills. For example, investigators have reported positive experiences with training programs that teach research skills, 1 clinical techniques, 2,3 and communication skills. 4,5 Although these programs used various approaches, investigators commonly reported that providing actionable information alongside ample opportunity to implement new skills was a major ingredient for success.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

ReCAP: Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Pilot Program to Facilitate Quality Improvement Learning in Oncology: Experience of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Training Program

Kamal¹,

Quinn²,

Gilligan³

et al. 2016

JOP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Evaluation of a laparoscopic training program with or without robotic assistance

Cited by 7 publications

References 23 publications

Influence of Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Experience Skills on Robotic Surgery Dexterity

Influence of Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Experience Skills on Robotic Surgery Dexterity

Influence of minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery experience in minimally invasive robotic surgery dexterity

ReCAP: Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Pilot Program to Facilitate Quality Improvement Learning in Oncology: Experience of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Quality Training Program

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About