1981
DOI: 10.1128/aac.20.5.696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a direct blood culture disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility test

Abstract: A total of 556 unique blood culture isolates of nonfastidious aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria were examined by direct and standardized disk susceptibility test methods (4,234 antibiotic-organism comparisons). When discrepancies which could be accounted for by the variability inherent in disk diffusion susceptibility tests were excluded, the direct method demonstrated 96.8% overall agreement with the standardized method. A total of 1.6% minor, 1.5% major, and 0.1% very major discrepancies were note… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
37
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
5
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Susceptibility testing for the 11 antibiotics had an overall increase in accuracy with a higher percentage in MIC agreement than this in the previous study on pure isolates. Direct susceptibility testing using the disk method was found to be useful, providing results up to 24 h sooner (2,12). However, the reliability of the direct disk susceptibility assay may be difficult to establish due to the fact that the techniques have not been well standardized (4,11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Susceptibility testing for the 11 antibiotics had an overall increase in accuracy with a higher percentage in MIC agreement than this in the previous study on pure isolates. Direct susceptibility testing using the disk method was found to be useful, providing results up to 24 h sooner (2,12). However, the reliability of the direct disk susceptibility assay may be difficult to establish due to the fact that the techniques have not been well standardized (4,11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the success of the Etest in fungal susceptibility testing and in light of its success in direct antibacterial susceptibility testing (9,15,18), we felt that a similar procedure for the direct antifungal testing of fungi could be developed. The major question at the outset appeared to be whether fungi grew to a level in blood culture medium significant enough to serve as a direct inoculum for the test.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the interpretive breakpoints defined by NCCLS for flucytosine, fluconazole, and itraconazole (20), the MICs obtained by the different methods were translated into susceptibility categories (resistant, intermediate/susceptible-dose dependent, and susceptible). The results of interpretive susceptibilities obtained from DET (or ET) were compared with those obtained from the MD method, and discrepancies were classified as very major (false susceptibility by DET or ET), major (false resistance by DET or ET), or minor (9). A minor error was defined as any change involving a dose dependently or intermediately susceptible result.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the correlations between the disc diffusion method and broth dilution method for 10 antibiotics against 17 oxytetracycline-resistant isolates were 97.65 % in agreement between methods and 2.35 % showing major error. Major errors between methods using fluoroquinolones such as ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin against Enterobacteriaceae (Steward et al, 1999), and clindamycin, the second-generation lincomycin against staphylococci and micrococci (Doern et al, 1981), have been reported previously. In the present study, the finding of increasing incidence of GBS isolates resistant to tetracycline with high MIC and MBC values emphasizes the need to …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%