2016
DOI: 10.1118/1.4960366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of a deformable registration algorithm for subsequent lung computed tomography imaging during radiochemotherapy

Abstract: Automatic lung segmentation remains challenging but can assist the manual delineation process. Proven by three techniques, the inspected DIR algorithm delivers reliable results for the lung CT data sets acquired at different time points. Clinical application of DIR demands a fast DIR evaluation to identify unacceptable results, for instance, by combining different automated DIR evaluation methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of extensive tissue changes such as atelectasis resolution, pleural effusion, and radiation-induced damage is known to result in decreased registration accuracy or registration failure for current state-of-the-art algorithms 2628 . Over 60% of the studies summarized in Table 2 report accuracy of registration between different respiratory phases of a 4DCT study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of extensive tissue changes such as atelectasis resolution, pleural effusion, and radiation-induced damage is known to result in decreased registration accuracy or registration failure for current state-of-the-art algorithms 2628 . Over 60% of the studies summarized in Table 2 report accuracy of registration between different respiratory phases of a 4DCT study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nielsen et al used lymphoma patients for which large tumors were absent from the lung volume 29 . Neither Cazoulat et al nor Stützer et al included patients with atelectasis, though the images used by Cazoulat did contain some tumor regression 16, 28 . The difference in difficulty from intra-fraction to longitudinal registration is illustrated by Stützer’s finding of an increase in mean registration error of their algorithm from 1.0 mm using the DIRlab data to 2.9 mm using longitudinal data 28 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lung cancer and upper-abdominal malignancies, tumor volumes are manually delineated on each phase of the 4D CT [64]. By enabling GTV propagation between the 4D CT phases [65][66][67][68][69][70], DIR reduced the delineation time by a factor of 2 (from 40 min to 18 min) [65,66]. The propagated GTV delineations were similar to the manual delineations [71], with a reported DSC greater than 0.76, which is similar to the reported intra-physician variation score [65,67].…”
Section: Multimodal Image Fusion Morphological and Functionalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vector fields were assessed qualitatively with tools in RayStation and rated as sufficiently precise for the given purpose. It is highly important to evaluate the vector field quality for each deformable image registration to assess the uncertainties introduced in the dose calculation as highlighted in Ribeiro et al 13 Quantitative evaluation, however, is largely time-consuming and complicated (e.g., based on manually choosing landmarks in both registered datasets) 17 and currently not featured in RayStation.…”
Section: B 4d Dose Reconstruction Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%