No abstract

Introduction: Large anatomical variations can be observed during the treatment course intensitymodulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer (HNC), leading to potential dose variations. Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) uses one or several replanning sessions to correct these variations and thus optimize the delivered dose distribution to the daily anatomy of the patient. This review, which is focused on ART in the HNC, aims to identify the various strategies of ART and to estimate the dosimetric and clinical benefits of these strategies. Material and methods: We performed an electronic search of articles published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Science Direct from January 2005 to December 2016. Among a total of 134 articles assessed for eligibility, 29 articles were ultimately retained for the review. Eighteen studies evaluated dosimetric variations without ART, and 11 studies reported the benefits of ART. Results: Eight in silico studies tested a number of replanning sessions, ranging from 1 to 6, aiming primarily to reduce the dose to the parotid glands. The optimal timing for replanning appears to be early during the first two weeks of treatment. Compared to standard IMRT, ART decreases the mean dose to the parotid gland from 0.6 to 6 Gy and the maximum dose to the spinal cord from 0.1 to 4 Gy while improving target coverage and homogeneity in most studies. Only five studies reported the clinical results of ART, and three of those studies included a non-randomized comparison with standard IMRT. These studies suggest a benefit of ART in regard to decreasing xerostomia, increasing quality of life, and increasing local control. Patients with the largest early anatomical and dose variations are the best candidates for ART. Conclusion: ART may decrease toxicity and improve local control for locally advanced HNC. However, randomized trials are necessary to demonstrate the benefit of ART before using the technique in routine practice.

Background: Deformable image registration (DIR) is increasingly used in the field of radiation therapy (RT) to account for anatomical deformations. The aims of this paper are to describe the main applications of DIR in RT and discuss current DIR evaluation methods. Methods: Articles on DIR published from January 2000 to October 2018 were extracted from PubMed and Science Direct. Our search was restricted to articles that report data obtained from humans, were written in English, and address DIR methods for RT. A total of 207 articles were selected from among 2506 identified in the search process. Results: At planning, DIR is used for organ delineation using atlas-based segmentation, deformationbased planning target volume definition, functional planning and magnetic resonance imaging-based dose calculation. In image-guided RT, DIR is used for contour propagation and dose calculation on per-treatment imaging. DIR is also used to determine the accumulated dose from fraction to fraction in external beam RT and brachytherapy, both for dose reporting and adaptive RT. In the case of reirradiation, DIR can be used to estimate the cumulated dose of the two irradiations. Finally, DIR can be used to predict toxicity in voxel-wise population analysis. However, the evaluation of DIR remains an open issue, especially when dealing with complex cases such as the disappearance of matter. To quantify DIR uncertainties, most evaluation methods are limited to geometry-based metrics. Software companies have now integrated DIR tools into treatment planning systems for clinical use, such as contour propagation and fraction dose accumulation. Conclusions: DIR is increasingly important in RT applications, from planning to toxicity prediction. DIR is routinely used to reduce the workload of contour propagation. However, its use for complex dosimetric applications must be carefully evaluated by combining quantitative and qualitative analyses.

To develop a tool for the automatic contouring of clinical treatment volumes (CTVs) and normal tissues for radiotherapy treatment planning in cervical cancer patients. Methods: An auto-contouring tool based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) was developed to delineate three cervical CTVs and 11 normal structures (seven OARs, four bony structures) in cervical cancer treatment for use with the Radiation Planning Assistant, a web-based automatic plan generation system. A total of 2254 retrospective clinical computed tomography (CT) scans from a single cancer center and 210 CT scans from a segmentation challenge were used to train and validate the CNN-based auto-contouring tool. The accuracy of the tool was evaluated by calculating the Sørensen-dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean surface and Hausdorff distances between the automatically generated contours and physician-drawn contours on 140 internal CT scans. A radiation oncologist scored the automatically generated contours on 30 external CT scans from three South African hospitals.

Bone thickness, anisotropy, and inhomogeneity have been reported to induce important variations in electroencephalogram (EEG) scalp potentials. To study this effect, we used an original three-dimensional (3-D) resistor mesh model described in spherical coordinates, consisting of 67,464 elements and 22,105 nodes arranged in 36 different concentric layers. After validation of the model by comparison with the analytic solution, potential variations induced by geometric and electrical skull modifications were investigated at the surface in the dipole plane and along the dipole axis, for several eccentricities and bone thicknesses. The resistor mesh permits one to obtain various configurations, as local modifications are introduced very easily. This has allowed several head models to be designed to study the effects of skull properties (thickness, anisotropy, and heterogeneity) on scalp surface potentials. Results show a decrease of potentials in bone, depending on bone thickness, and a very small decrease through the scalp layer. Nevertheless, similar scalp potentials can be obtained using either a thick scalp layer and a thin skull layer, and vice versa. It is thus important to take into account skull and scalp thicknesses, because the drop of potential in bone depends on both. The use of three different layers for skull instead of one leads to small differences in potential values and patterns. In contrast, the introduction of a hole in the skull highly increases the maximum potential value (by a factor of 11.5 in our case), because of the absence of potential drop in the corresponding volume. The inverse solution without any a priori knowledge indicates that the model with the hole gives the largest errors in both position and dipolar moment. Our results indicate that the resistor mesh model can be used as a robust and user-friendly simulation tool in EEG or event-related potentials. It makes it possible to build up real head models directly from anatomic magnetic resonance imaging without tessellation, and is able to take into account head heterogeneities very simply by changing volume elements conductivity. Hum. Brain Mapping 21:84-95, 2004.

In vitro electrical impedance spectrometry was performed on tissue samples excised from sheep. Measured data have been processed to reduce dispersion in measurements and to provide criteria useful for tissue comparison. Two electrical models are proposed for tissues exhibiting a one-circle impedance locus and a two-circle impedance locus. Measurement results and electrical parameters of tissues and models fitted to experimental data are presented. Model sensitivity to parameter variations is discussed.

In the context of head and neck cancer (HNC) adaptive radiation therapy (ART), the two purposes of the study were to compare the performance of multiple deformable image registration (DIR) methods and to quantify their impact for dose accumulation, in healthy structures. Fifteen HNC patients had a planning computed tomography (CT0) and weekly CTs during the 7 weeks of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Ten DIR approaches using different registration methods (demons or B-spline free form deformation (FFD)), preprocessing, and similarity metrics were tested. Two observers identified 14 landmarks (LM) on each CT-scan to compute LM registration error. The cumulated doses estimated by each method were compared. The two most effective DIR methods were the demons and the FFD, with both the mutual information (MI) metric and the filtered CTs. The corresponding LM registration accuracy (precision) was 2.44 mm (1.30 mm) and 2.54 mm (1.33 mm), respectively. The corresponding LM estimated cumulated dose accuracy (dose precision) was 0.85 Gy (0.93 Gy) and 0.88 Gy (0.95 Gy), respectively. The mean uncertainty (difference between maximal and minimal dose considering all the 10 methods) to estimate the cumulated mean dose to the parotid gland (PG) was 4.03 Gy (SD = 2.27 Gy, range: 1.06–8.91 Gy).

No abstract