Evaluation of a dairy agri-environmental programme for restoring woody green infrastructure

Abstract

Pastoral landscape woody vegetation provides ecosystem services, but potentially competes for space, light and nutrients that could provide additional farm production. A questionnaire determined the values and behaviours of New Zealand dairy farmers to evaluate voluntary agri-environmental programmes for restoring woody vegetation. Findings indicate the area is increasing, while the composition and configuration of networks are changing and redistributing. Farms with little are losing more, and those with more are gaining. Farmers are planting new areas to increase their public ecosystem services, but may not provide these services through planting and management. Barriers include insufficient private woody vegetation ecosystem services, and low rates of growth of native plants. Government incentive programmes are ineffective in overcoming barriers. Farmers may be motivated by stronger evidence of valued ecosystem services, information about their benefits and drawbacks and how to support services through planting and management. However, a targeted environmental stewardship scheme is required to overcome barriers to planting, with government and the dairy industry working together to develop and maintain a landscape-scaled woody vegetation network on private and public land. Such networks would build sustainability and resilience into dairy farming, leading to an equitably sharing of benefits and costs of their public ecosystem services. KEYWORDS

Developing a Landscape Design Approach for the Sustainable Land Management of Hill Country Farms in New Zealand

“…Farmers may recognize and be motivated by the great value that extra landscape services can provide and agree with a proposed landscape design, but a barrier to implementation of this design might be the lack of the long-term support that is needed to enable them to be able to afford the cost of implementation and to follow the suggested revised land use and environmental plan. For instance, increasing native woody vegetation on a farm provides a great range of landscape services, but it may potentially affect economic profit in the short term due to the fact that it would decrease land available for grazing and has a low growth rate [223], and thus have less earning capacity in its early life stages. A solution to this is for policy-makers in NZ to consider payment for landscape services.…”

Cooperation of Fruit Farms with the Institutional Environment toward Sustainable Development

“…Institutional conditions, therefore, seem to be one of the key factors for the functioning of economic entities regarding the requirements of sustainable development, perhaps also for the selection of adequate strategies of conduct on the market by enterprises and farms: the use of external resources and transferring part of the costs to business partners, or also relying on their own resources [23]. Agri-environmental programs (AES) are the main policy instrument aimed at sustainable agriculture [24]. Through AES, farmers are encouraged to protect the environment on their farmland in exchange for specific compensation [25].…”

Evaluation of an Incentive Programme for Increasing Green Infrastructure on Vineyards

“…Waipara grower attitudes regarding indigenous plants were similar to those of some other farmers in New Zealand. For example, dairy farmers mostly preferred mixtures of indigenous and exotic plantings to maximise services, including amenities and minimum maintenance [53]. Unless research identifies indigenous service plants with acceptable disservices and costs of implementation and management (at least equal to those of exotics) for growers, they are unlikely to implement only, or even predominantly, indigenous plants.…”