2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1694(02)00121-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of 1D and 2D numerical models for predicting river flood inundation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

15
600
2
16

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 925 publications
(642 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
15
600
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The spatial detail of the simulated inundation depths depends on the discretization level of the model setup which is usually below 100 m horizontal resolution (Horritt and Bates, 2002;Falter et al, 2014). The near-real-time application of hydrodynamic-numeric models is hampered by the need to provide appropriate estimates of initial and boundary conditions, to assimilate model simulations and observations (Matgen et al, 2007) and by considerable computational costs .…”
Section: State Of the Art And Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatial detail of the simulated inundation depths depends on the discretization level of the model setup which is usually below 100 m horizontal resolution (Horritt and Bates, 2002;Falter et al, 2014). The near-real-time application of hydrodynamic-numeric models is hampered by the need to provide appropriate estimates of initial and boundary conditions, to assimilate model simulations and observations (Matgen et al, 2007) and by considerable computational costs .…”
Section: State Of the Art And Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The near-real-time application of hydrodynamic-numeric models is hampered by the need to provide appropriate estimates of initial and boundary conditions, to assimilate model simulations and observations (Matgen et al, 2007) and by considerable computational costs . Computation time depends particularly on the size of the computational domain and its spatial resolution (Falter et al, 2013) and the complexity level of model equations (Horritt and Bates, 2002). Alternatively, the inundated areas and inundation depths can be calculated in advance for a set of flood scenarios.…”
Section: State Of the Art And Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such model requires relatively more detail topographic data compared to 1D model. Horritt and Bates (2002) point out that, without detail topographic data, the two models (1D and 2D) show relatively similar performances. Since this research was using topographic data with 30 m horizontal resolution, the 1D approach has been selected to complete the flow dynamic and maps the inundated areas of the Upper Citarum Watershed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To predict the impacts of flood wave on the floodplain, the hydraulic processes of the river have to be assessed at optimal temporal and spatial scales using hydraulic models. Several efforts have been made to develop hydraulic models that can simulate flow patterns and predict extreme flood levels in rivers and floodplains [5][6][7][8][9][10]. The development of an accurate and reliable hydraulic model that well describes surface water flow across a large wetland floodplain depends on topographic data and hydraulic roughness, viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%