Evaluation index system for public participation in post-disaster housing reconstruction in Dujiangyan

Zhong, Lingyan; Bai, Ligang; Xiang, Mingming

doi:10.1108/ohi-01-2021-0018

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Afzalan and Muller (2018) [66] proposed building community consensus by cultivating trust and mobilizing citizen action and generating support. Zhong (2022) [70] describes a collaborative process in which different groups (district, neighborhood, community) and citizens were not only informed, consulted, and trained but also empowered to undertake parts of the reconstruction work themselves. Flacke et al (2020) [67] introduced a process of public dialogue, social learning, and citizen training using an interactive collaborative tool to facilitate active participation and co-management to achieve policy goals.…”

Section: Co-managementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Satisfaction of different groups concerning the public transportation system [56]; levels of satisfaction with the participation method [62]; participants' satisfaction with process and outcomes [49]; overall satisfaction of participating in post-disaster reconstruction [70]; satisfaction with the process [53]; user-satisfaction measures [54].…”

Section: Behavioral Change (N = 4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…"Satisfaction" is mentioned in six of the studies. Here there is a difference between those examining the participants' satisfaction with the participatory process [49,53,70], the choice of method for participation [62], and the general public service delivery [56,79].…”

Section: Behavioral Change (N = 4)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Evaluating the Impact of Public Participation Processes on Participants in Smart City Development: A Scoping Review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper provides an overview of the current state of research on the evaluation methods of participatory processes in smart cities. Specifically, it aims to identify and analyze existing evaluation methods and frameworks for public participation (PP) in smart city development. The study focuses on the evaluation of participatory processes to find key indicators and enable an assessment of PP from multiple perspectives. A scoping literature review was conducted to analyze the past ten years of scientific literature on the topic. Relevant literature was retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, and articles were selected based on a set of criteria to ensure quality and relevance. We found that digital participation, also known as “e-participation”, is the most used method either exclusively or mixed with in-person methods. The level of participation achieved was mostly limited to the first two degrees of PP (i.e., information and consultation), and only a few papers addressed the highest degrees (i.e., agenda-setting and co-management). The impact on participants was mostly related to knowledge and skills, awareness raising, and satisfaction with the process and method. This paper highlights the potential to upskill citizens and enhance their understanding of sustainable urban development, fostering their commitment to achieving the United Nations’ sustainability goals for climate change mitigation in the urban context.

show abstract