2017
DOI: 10.3726/b10531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation in media discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation is as a kind of cognitive activity, as in epistemological terms, any cognitive act expresses the attitude of the speaker to the object described, that is, contains an act of evaluation (Breeze & Olza, 2017;Martin & White, 2005). The evaluative moment is nothing but a person's mental operation held on the subject of utterance (perception, understanding, synthesis, conclusion, etc.…”
Section: The Essence Of the Category Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation is as a kind of cognitive activity, as in epistemological terms, any cognitive act expresses the attitude of the speaker to the object described, that is, contains an act of evaluation (Breeze & Olza, 2017;Martin & White, 2005). The evaluative moment is nothing but a person's mental operation held on the subject of utterance (perception, understanding, synthesis, conclusion, etc.…”
Section: The Essence Of the Category Of Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of investigations into the semantic and cognitive nature of evaluation were made by Arutyunova (1999), Bednarek (2009), Ishchenko (2010), Kosmeda (2000), Martin and White (2005), Prykhodko (2016), Vol'f (2006), Wang and Xu (2013), and Wright (1997). Some researchers studied the functional and pragmatic specificity of positive and negative types of evaluation (Arutyunova, 1999;Halliday & Matthiessen, 2014;Kosmeda, 2000;Krysanova, 1999;Prihodko, 2016;Shkitska, 2012;Vol'f, 2006;White, 2016) as well as the context of their realisation in different types of discourse (Breeze & Olza, 2017;Honcharova, 2002;Thompson & Alba-Juez, 2014). Honcharova (2002) and Vol′f (2006) suggested communicative evaluative models that included an addresser's aim, his/her tactics and their realisation, an addressee's response and a result of such an interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Honcharova (2002) and Vol′f (2006) suggested communicative evaluative models that included an addresser's aim, his/her tactics and their realisation, an addressee's response and a result of such an interaction. Most of the mentioned authors (Arutyunova, 1999;Breeze & Olza, 2017;Honcharova, 2002;Krysanova, 1999;Shkitska, 2012;Vol'f, 2006) highlighted the importance of an addresser's evaluative utterance. However, there is still a need for a closer look at the addressee's utterance that contains evaluation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%