2012
DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e31825840ab
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation for intra-abdominal injury in children after blunt torso trauma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
22
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although CT scans are considered the primary diagnostic modality for the evaluation of haemodynamically stable children with torso trauma, there are concerns of cost and the potential for radiation-associated malignancies. 9 Recently, a clinical decision rule (CDR) has been suggested to identify children who are at very low risk of intra-abdominal injuries and hence would not require abdominal CTs; however, although costeffective, the validity of this CDR still requires further research. 9,10 In the current study, the CT scan rate appears high; however, this may be because all children with torso trauma detected on CT scans were included in the study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although CT scans are considered the primary diagnostic modality for the evaluation of haemodynamically stable children with torso trauma, there are concerns of cost and the potential for radiation-associated malignancies. 9 Recently, a clinical decision rule (CDR) has been suggested to identify children who are at very low risk of intra-abdominal injuries and hence would not require abdominal CTs; however, although costeffective, the validity of this CDR still requires further research. 9,10 In the current study, the CT scan rate appears high; however, this may be because all children with torso trauma detected on CT scans were included in the study cohort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Recently, a clinical decision rule (CDR) has been suggested to identify children who are at very low risk of intra-abdominal injuries and hence would not require abdominal CTs; however, although costeffective, the validity of this CDR still requires further research. 9,10 In the current study, the CT scan rate appears high; however, this may be because all children with torso trauma detected on CT scans were included in the study cohort. Hence, the exact CT scan rate for children presenting with torso trauma at SQUH is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the AST and ALT concentrations are reportedly sensitive diagnostic markers with which to evaluate the degree of trauma caused by blunt hepatic injuries. 20 , 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for non-invasive, cost-effective, and accurate procedures has increased the tendency to use imaging techniques for evaluating patients with BAT. Although a CTscan is the gold standard in abdominal assessment in BAT, some limitations such as x-ray exposure, high costs, possibility of renal poisoning in case of using contrast media, artifact due to patient movement, and need for patient transportation have led to reduced use of CT-scan in such patients (10,11). Alternatively, many studies have shown that ultrasound can be replaced by DPL or CT-scan (12,13); however, there are some evidences that show relying on ultrasound as the only means of assessing BAT victims instead of DPL or CT scan may lead to misdiagnosis (14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%