1998
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.51.4.1232-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation and management of intracranial mass lesions in AIDS: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The current guidelines for diagnosis of intracranial lesions state that T1 SPECT is an option when available. When positive (marked uptake in contrast to toxoplasma), it appears to be highly specific for primary CNS lymphoma [6, 8]. These guidelines have been described as helpful [3] in spinal cord lesions and suspected lymphoma, although specific guidelines for spinal cord lesions are not presently available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The current guidelines for diagnosis of intracranial lesions state that T1 SPECT is an option when available. When positive (marked uptake in contrast to toxoplasma), it appears to be highly specific for primary CNS lymphoma [6, 8]. These guidelines have been described as helpful [3] in spinal cord lesions and suspected lymphoma, although specific guidelines for spinal cord lesions are not presently available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empiric treatment for toxoplasmosis with oral pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine (with folinic acid) has been recommended in all cases of intracranial mass lesions in patients with HIV/AIDS (except in a solitary mass with negative toxoplasma serology) [6]. It is also believed to be beneficial when there is spinal cord involvement [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although other causes of hydrocephalus in HIV have been reported, none of these reports met our criteria for inclusion. [5][6][7][8]96,97 Understanding how outcomes differ following VPS insertion in HIV-infected and non-infected patients with causes of hydrocephalus not directly attributable to HIV infection (e.g. subarachnoid haemorrhage, Chiari malformation, etc) would allow determination of the relative impacts of undertaking VPS in the context of active CSF infection and HIV-infection.…”
Section: Suggestions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%