2015
DOI: 10.1080/10888691.2015.1113879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating youth development programs: Progress and promise

Abstract: Advances in theories of adolescent development and positive youth development have greatly increased our understanding of how programs and practices with adolescents can impede or enhance their development. In this paper the authors reflect on the progress in research on youth development programs in the last two decades, since possibly the first review of empirical evaluations by Roth, Brooks-Gunn, Murray, and Foster (1998). The authors use the terms Version 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 to refer to changes in youth devel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
125
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
7
125
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, recent PYD literature has highlighted the increasing need to understand the processes through which youth development takes place (Arnold, 2015;Roth & Brooks-Gunn, 2016). In an effort to understand the process of identity formation more clearly, Crocetti et al (2008) proposed a dual-cycle model of identity formation and maintenance.…”
Section: Figure1 Identity Status Model (Marcia 1983)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, recent PYD literature has highlighted the increasing need to understand the processes through which youth development takes place (Arnold, 2015;Roth & Brooks-Gunn, 2016). In an effort to understand the process of identity formation more clearly, Crocetti et al (2008) proposed a dual-cycle model of identity formation and maintenance.…”
Section: Figure1 Identity Status Model (Marcia 1983)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Youth are referred to the R&R Club by school staff based on specific criteria, including: being from a low-income family, having limited opportunities to participate in physical activities, having delays in literacy, and exhibiting behavioural issues. This program aligned with Roth and Brooks-Gunn's (2015) criteria for a PYD program in that it: (a) emphasised program goals that value and intend to promote PYD; (b) provided an atmosphere that supports positive relationships with peers and leaders, empowers youth, expectations of positive behaviour, and opportunities for recognition; and (c) offered challenging and motivating activities for youth to engage in.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper represents an important step in responding to calls for increased evaluation in youth programs (Roth & Brooks-Gunn, 2015) and represents a summary of one of the first process evaluations conducted of a communitybased STEM program for youth in a Canadian context. The CSC program provides consistent, hands-on STEMlearning opportunities for youth living in low-income housing during out-of-school time.…”
Section: Next Steps Future Recommendations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%