2015
DOI: 10.1177/138826271501700403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating What Works for Whom in Active Labour Market Policies

Abstract: In order to make informed and legitimate decisions in labour market policies, European and national policy makers need better knowledge of what type of interventions works for whom. The European Commission and many Member States have high hopes that ‘experimental evaluation’ techniques (such as randomised controlled experiments, systematic meta-analysis and econometric outcome evaluations) will deliver solid and clear evidence to inform the development of more rational decision-making processes. This article r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The other programs in the meta-analysis of Butschek and Walter (2014) yielded mostly insignificant results. This finding is supported by a similar finding in the general ALMP literature showing that wage subsidies in the private sector are the most efficient type of ALMP, but that other types of programs (such as in-house programs, job search assistance, and training programs) are more frequently used (Bredgaard 2015).…”
Section: Matchingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The other programs in the meta-analysis of Butschek and Walter (2014) yielded mostly insignificant results. This finding is supported by a similar finding in the general ALMP literature showing that wage subsidies in the private sector are the most efficient type of ALMP, but that other types of programs (such as in-house programs, job search assistance, and training programs) are more frequently used (Bredgaard 2015).…”
Section: Matchingsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Such challenges around value-for-money matter, because policymakers will only prioritise co-production in employability if we can evidence that it delivers transitions to work. We acknowledge that the broader evidence base on employability is inconclusive -'what works' in terms of the governance and content of services depends on labour market context and user characteristics (Bredgaard, 2015). However, whatever the limitations of this programme and our research, there appear to be lessons, if policymakers are interested in coproduction as a model for future service delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…function separately, but only in combination with other policies and programs under different structural and economic conditions. Being so, the results are difficult to measure in the short term (Bredgaard, 2015). Assessments based on microdata show that the effects of the ALMP on employability do not appear or they are small in the short term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Besides, there are few recent macroeconomics studies that analysed the effects of ALMP programs, except the research of Escudero (2018). In his research, Bredgaard (2015) even argues that a database that would support research on how ALMP programs actually work is not yet available. Despite the data accessibility hindrance, a number of researchers studied the impact of ALMP on employment or unemployment rate in the time periods from 1985 until 2008 (Kluve & Weber, 2009;Kluve, 2010;Heckman et al, 1999;Kluve and Schmidt, 2002;Kluve et al, 2002;Card et al, 2010, Nie andStruby, 2011;Laporšek and Dolenc, 2011;Boone and van Ours, 2004;Estevão, 2003;Estevão, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%