2016
DOI: 10.1177/0040517516651101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating turnout composite layering strategies for reducing thermal burden in structural firefighter protective clothing systems

Abstract: A modular approach for arranging the component layers used in the construction of structural firefighter turnout garments is explored as a strategy for reducing the thermal burden contributed by these protective garments to firefighter heat stress. An instrumented sweating manikin was used to measure the insulation, evaporative resistance and total heat loss through turnout systems configured to represent different layering strategies. The outer shell, moisture barrier and thermal liner layers of the structura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As summarized in Table 3, the average overall ensemble volume is much bigger than previously reported [4,69,70], but do roughly correspond to study done by McQuerry et al [71], although this study was done on three-layer combinations for fire protection with much bigger ease allowances added. This was expected since most of the studies do not report the measurements for three-layered ensembles.…”
Section: Volume Calculations and Their Impact On The Effective Thermasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As summarized in Table 3, the average overall ensemble volume is much bigger than previously reported [4,69,70], but do roughly correspond to study done by McQuerry et al [71], although this study was done on three-layer combinations for fire protection with much bigger ease allowances added. This was expected since most of the studies do not report the measurements for three-layered ensembles.…”
Section: Volume Calculations and Their Impact On The Effective Thermasupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Manikin thermal resistance ( R t ), evaporative resistance ( R et ), and MTHL results of the individual garment layers have been previously published in a preceding article. 29 This data is shown in Table 2. The TL had the highest MTHL on the sweating manikin in both the static (117.5 W/m 2 ) and dynamic (265.1 W/m 2 ) test conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the multilayered materials, MCM's R ct (0.12 m 2 Á C/W) was slightly higher, while the value for R et (117.71 m 2 ÁPa/W) was lower than those of MCPL (see Table 1); this is because the inner layer material (i.e., hemp fabric) showed the highest thermal and lowest evaporative resistances (Huang, 2006;McQuerry et al, 2017). Therefore, permeable materials are closely related to higher R ct and lower R et in comparison to impermeable materials.…”
Section: Heat and Moisture Transfer Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 96%