2014
DOI: 10.5038/2375-0901.17.4.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Performance of Public Urban Transportation Systems in India

Abstract: Evaluating the performance of public transportation systems facilitates operational improvement and strategic decisions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relative performance of 26 public urban transportation organizations in India using various criteria. We grouped these 19 criteria as Operations, Finance, and Accident-based. First, we evaluated the importance of these criteria groups using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Then, we evaluated the organizations (Decision Making Units, DMUs) us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the GIS was used to create demographic profiles within the service corridors, then DEA was applied to compute the operational efficiency and spatial effectiveness for comparison of operational and spatial aspects of the bus lines. Vaidya [17] evaluated the relative performance of 26 public transport undertakings in India based on 19 criteria, grouped into operations, finance, and accident categories, then evaluated their importance using the AHP. Furthermore, DEA was used to evaluate the public transport undertakings using various criteria within each group.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, the GIS was used to create demographic profiles within the service corridors, then DEA was applied to compute the operational efficiency and spatial effectiveness for comparison of operational and spatial aspects of the bus lines. Vaidya [17] evaluated the relative performance of 26 public transport undertakings in India based on 19 criteria, grouped into operations, finance, and accident categories, then evaluated their importance using the AHP. Furthermore, DEA was used to evaluate the public transport undertakings using various criteria within each group.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They developed an evaluation criterion to compare different operators working in similar conditions to find the best performing public transport operator. Vaidya [31] applied the AHP approach to evaluate the relative performance of 26 public urban transportation organizations in India using 19 criteria clustered as operational, financial, and accident-based, to help decision makers achieve better results. Although the AHP is used for several multi-criteria problems, such as improving the quality of public transportation, the technique is not satisfactory for all types of studies and can suffer from some inability e.g., produces unreliable results [32].…”
Section: Literature Review On Mcdm For Transportation and Consultatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the literature, it was also observed that the quality centric assessment studies applied multi-criteria and fuzzy logic approaches to address the subjective nature of the variables and to strengthen the results. Adding strength to this observation, Vaidya [37] and Patrick and Mulley [38] adopted data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of bus and metro systems, respectively. Further, the authors have adopted AHP and partial factor productivity (PFP) in combination with DEA.…”
Section: Review Of Mcdm Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%