2020
DOI: 10.1175/jtech-d-20-0013.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Leeway Coefficient of Ocean Drifters Using Operational Marine Environmental Prediction Systems

Abstract: The water following characteristics of six different drifter types are investigated using two different operational marine environmental prediction systems: one produced by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) and the other produced by the Norwegian Meteorological Institute (METNO). These marine prediction systems include ocean circulation models, atmospheric models, and surface wave models. Two leeway models are tested for use in drift object prediction: an implicit leeway model where the Stokes drift… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slightly larger values for α i using the TOPAZ data compared to the CAPS data. For α w , this range of values is consistent with 3% required for the prediction of surface drifters (Sutherland et al, 2020) and oil spill modelling (Nordam et al, 2019). The α i values are curiously consistent with canonical values used for icebergs of about 2% of the wind and 30 • to the right (Leppäranta, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Slightly larger values for α i using the TOPAZ data compared to the CAPS data. For α w , this range of values is consistent with 3% required for the prediction of surface drifters (Sutherland et al, 2020) and oil spill modelling (Nordam et al, 2019). The α i values are curiously consistent with canonical values used for icebergs of about 2% of the wind and 30 • to the right (Leppäranta, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These leeway values can represent direct wind forcing on the object (Kirwan Jr et al, 1975), and/or wind-dependent physics which are not included in the operational prediction system. As most operational marine prediction systems don't include surface waves it is common to include the Stokes drift (Breivik and Christensen, 2020) which can be approximated by a leeway coefficient (Breivik et al, 2011;Sutherland et al, 2020). In addition, material at the surface, such as oil but also ice, will strongly attenuate surface waves creating an additional force on the material (Weber, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We did not aim to assess all specific differences between individual drifters and discuss in detail the wind forcing and the North Sea circulation during the different periods of their deployment, as this was done by [27]. Neither did we aim to tune the model to find the optimal percentage of the contribution of either the Stokes drift or windage that can be taken into account in OpenDrift simulations (as was recently done by [64]. Additional errors of the drifter simulations can be due to the errors in the atmospheric forcing, but also the boundary or tidal forcing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not clear yet how to properly include this process when simulating drifter trajectories (e.g., Breivik & Allen, 2008;Callies et al, 2017;De Dominicis BRUCIAFERRI ET AL. et al, 2016;Röhrs et al, 2012;Staneva et al, 2021;Sutherland et al, 2020). In addition, studies on modeling the trajectory of SVP drifters are scarce (e.g., Abascal et al, 2012;Amemou et al, 2020;Kjellsson & Doos, 2012), especially during storm conditions.…”
Section: Assessment Of the Lagrangian Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%