2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the joint effects of climate and land use change on runoff and pollutant loading in a rapidly developing watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results show that all selected indicators passed the 5% significance test ( p < 0.05) and we found that land use and composition were the primary drivers of the Nr losses in the TLB (Fig. S6 , Table 5 ), which was consistent with previous research work 20 , 58 60 . The LUCC had the most substantial explanatory power for Nr loss, with q -values above 0.8 and a mean value of 0.82 over the study period (Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results show that all selected indicators passed the 5% significance test ( p < 0.05) and we found that land use and composition were the primary drivers of the Nr losses in the TLB (Fig. S6 , Table 5 ), which was consistent with previous research work 20 , 58 60 . The LUCC had the most substantial explanatory power for Nr loss, with q -values above 0.8 and a mean value of 0.82 over the study period (Table 5 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Urban development and intensive agricultural activities elevate nutrient outflow, rendering croplands and urban areas essential contributors to Nr losses 27 . Expanding building areas will generate more impervious surfaces, increasing urban runoff and heightening the risk of Nr loss 60 62 . Our simulation of land use scenarios in BUA and ED also reveals that urban development leads to deforestation and increased Nr loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous watershed modeling studies conducted in the Chesapeake Bay region generally tend to agree in predicting increases in winter and spring streamflow coupled with decreases in summer streamflow as a result of climate change (Alamdari et al, 2017, 2022; Hawkins, 2015; Neff et al, 2000; Wagena et al, 2018). However, the relative magnitude of the predicted changes varies greatly both among studies and across different climate simulations within the same study, resulting in both negative and positive projected changes in streamflow at the annual scale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In some other research, concerns have been raised about the validity of using the difference in NCEP/NCAR reanalysis and observed surface temperature as a measure of the impact of urbanization and land use changes on climate in parts of the united states (Kalnay et al, 2003). From the foregoing, the climate-land use related research may be grouped into three categories which include (i) investigating the impact of climate change on land use change (Gao and Liu, 2011;Pipitpukdee et al, 2020;Pramudya et al, 2016;Wajid et al, 2020); (ii) investigating the land use impact on climate change (Findell et al, 2017;Hou et al, 2021;Sylla et al, 2016), and (iii) investigating the impact of the combined effects climate change and land use change on other environmental variables using modeling tools (Alamdari et al, 2022;Amir et al, 2021;Gabiri et al, 2019;Hung et al, 2020;Selwood et al, 2014;Tirupathi and Shashidhar, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling tools have become useful to simulate the combined effects of climate-land interactions but also help to establish mechanisms leading to various environmental outcomes including biodiversity (Schulte to Bühne et al, 2021;Srinivasan and Wilcove, 2021), population (Molotoks et al, 2021), pathogens (Casazza et al, 2020), and food security impact of elevated CO 2 (J. , just to mention a few. Modeling tools have dominated climate-land related research due to their ability to model complex interactions and better represent environmental concerns such as stream ow and hydrological predictions, pollutant loading, water balance, and water quality (Achugbu et al, 2021;Alamdari et al, 2022;Boone et al, 2016;Cao and Dan, 2021;Chilukoti & Xue, 2021;Gabiri et al, 2020;Hung et al, 2020;Idrissou et al, 2022;Jain et al, 2021;Nyatuame et al, 2020;Ross and Randhir, 2022;Selwood et al, 2014;Srinivasan and Wilcove, 2021;Sylla et al, 2016;Tirupathi and Shashidhar, 2020;Tu, 2009), amongst others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%