Evaluating the intelligence in dialogue systems

Edwards, Jack L.; Mason, J. Alden

doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(88)80035-x

Cited by 12 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Bewertungskriterien oder -dimensionen können beispielsweise die Funktionalität, die Angemessenheit, die Eleganz und die Verständlichkeit umfassen [Edwards, Mason, 1988]. Bewertungskriterien oder -dimensionen können beispielsweise die Funktionalität, die Angemessenheit, die Eleganz und die Verständlichkeit umfassen [Edwards, Mason, 1988].…”

Section: Dialogsystemeunclassified

Mensch-Maschine-Systeme

Johannsen

1993

Springer-Lehrbuch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Dialogsystemeunclassified

Mensch-Maschine-Systeme

Johannsen

1993

Springer-Lehrbuch

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…They can also be shown to be the generative principles behind many fundamental theories such as: Pask's (1980) discourse universals in conversation theory; Fillmore's (1968) linguistic universals in case grammars; and Pope's (1984) anthropological universals (Gaines & Shaw 1984. Hierarchical application of the basic distinctions can be shown to generate complex technological frameworks such as Edwards and Mason's (1986) evaluation methodology for person-computer interaction (Gaines & Shaw 1986d). It is reasonable to suppose that these basic distinctions are the generators underlying any knowledge representation methodology.…”

Section: Fig1 Worlds Generated By Basic Distinctionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Logical foundations for knowledge representation in intelligent systems

Gaines

1986

Proceedings of the ACM SIGART International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We have entered an era of intelligent system development in which fifth and sixth generation computing systems are expected to emulate and enhance natural intelligence. However, human knowledge processes are not well-understood and it is tempting to base the technology of intelligent systems on formal reasoning rather than human psychology. In particular, the attempt to base knowledge processing in fifth generation computing systems on logic programming suggests that we should examine the rationale behind standard logic. It was developed as a foundation for arithmetic and psychological considerations were ruled out as irrelevant. We should consider that there may be systems of logic more appropriate to knowledge processing. Logical and psychological system theories based on an axiom of unrestricted predication are plausible and attractive alternatives to standard logic. It is suggested that the design of logical inference processors should take such systems into account, and that investigation of the logical, psychological and systemic foundations of knowledge are fundamental to the development of intelligent systems.

show abstract

The design of joint cognitive systems: the effect of cognitive coupling on performance

Dalal

Kasper

1994

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluating the intelligence in dialogue systems

Cited by 12 publications

References 18 publications

Mensch-Maschine-Systeme

Mensch-Maschine-Systeme

Logical foundations for knowledge representation in intelligent systems

The design of joint cognitive systems: the effect of cognitive coupling on performance

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About