Abstract:As corporate community initiatives (CCI) in sport are becoming an important dimension of corporate social responsibility, a key issue is evaluating the quality of the processes by which they are delivered and how they are managed. The purpose of this study was to explore the implementation process of a professional sport team's CCI using program evaluation theory (Chen, 2005). Interviews were conducted with 42 key stakeholders (team executives, partnership implementers, participants, parents, coaches) from one… Show more
“…The practical evolution of CSR as a value-based approach in sport has been accompanied by empirical insights on its determinants, pressures, and motives (e.g., Babiak & Wolfe, 2009;Babiak & Trendafilova, 2011;Hamil & Morrow, 2011), and the extent to which PTSOs can obtain any value through their foundations' practices (Extejt, 2004;Inoue, Kent, & Lee, 2011;Kihl, Babiak, & Tainsky, 2014). However, still missing from the sport management and marketing literature is an integrative framework -one that would be akin to a more current paradigmatic SDL -for CSR value co-creation.…”
Despite the increasing number and significance of charitable foundations in various business sectors, their role in cocreating corporate social responsibility (CSR) value remains unclear. This paper identifies CSR value cocreation in professional team sport organizations (PTSOs) and answers three key research questions: (a) Why have PTSOs developed charitable foundations as their means toward CSR value cocreation? (b) What CSR-related resources do PTSOs and their charitable foundations integrate? and (c) How do they manage, share, and transfer such resources to cocreate CSR value? Drawing theoretical insights from service dominant logic and consumer culture theory—and using empirical data from 47 semistructured interviews of UK-based professional football (soccer) clubs—this study develops a communicating vessels framework to illustrate the role of charitable foundations in the CSR value cocreation process. Through four tentative CSR value cocreation levels of relationship (bolt-on, cooperative, controlled, and strategic) the study suggests several internal strategies that can enhance the level of collaboration between founders and foundations. These include information sharing through customer relationship management (CRM) systems and social media platforms; staff sharing or flexible movement across the organizations; quality assurance agreements; flexible team cooperation; partnership protocols with social, media, cultural, and commercial stakeholders; and cotraining of personnel.
“…The practical evolution of CSR as a value-based approach in sport has been accompanied by empirical insights on its determinants, pressures, and motives (e.g., Babiak & Wolfe, 2009;Babiak & Trendafilova, 2011;Hamil & Morrow, 2011), and the extent to which PTSOs can obtain any value through their foundations' practices (Extejt, 2004;Inoue, Kent, & Lee, 2011;Kihl, Babiak, & Tainsky, 2014). However, still missing from the sport management and marketing literature is an integrative framework -one that would be akin to a more current paradigmatic SDL -for CSR value co-creation.…”
Despite the increasing number and significance of charitable foundations in various business sectors, their role in cocreating corporate social responsibility (CSR) value remains unclear. This paper identifies CSR value cocreation in professional team sport organizations (PTSOs) and answers three key research questions: (a) Why have PTSOs developed charitable foundations as their means toward CSR value cocreation? (b) What CSR-related resources do PTSOs and their charitable foundations integrate? and (c) How do they manage, share, and transfer such resources to cocreate CSR value? Drawing theoretical insights from service dominant logic and consumer culture theory—and using empirical data from 47 semistructured interviews of UK-based professional football (soccer) clubs—this study develops a communicating vessels framework to illustrate the role of charitable foundations in the CSR value cocreation process. Through four tentative CSR value cocreation levels of relationship (bolt-on, cooperative, controlled, and strategic) the study suggests several internal strategies that can enhance the level of collaboration between founders and foundations. These include information sharing through customer relationship management (CRM) systems and social media platforms; staff sharing or flexible movement across the organizations; quality assurance agreements; flexible team cooperation; partnership protocols with social, media, cultural, and commercial stakeholders; and cotraining of personnel.
“…Where appropriate the research team offered guidance and support to ensure a consistent approach to data collection. Ongoing communication between the research team and BACT (both senior management and leads for evaluation) and research team was maintained through a range of techniques (informal and formal meetings, telephone calls and emails), aligned with the development of effective partnerships (Kihl, Babiak, & Tainsky, 2014). In the future, the research team would provide analysis and reports on the data collected to support BACT stakeholder dissemination.…”
This article outlines a partnership between an academic institute and a third sector organisation attached to a professional football club in the United Kingdom. The partnership concerns a sport for development intervention. The purpose of the article is to outline the development of applied monitoring and evaluation and the application of intervention mapping for an intervention to tackle anti-social behaviour through a football-based social inclusion project for children and young people. This case supports the development of third sector-university partnerships and the use of intervention mapping to meet shared objectives in relation to articulating the impact of interventions to funders and for research outputs.
“…Community service is one of the most frequently researched areas in sport and CSR (Kihl, Babiak, & Tainsky, 2014;Misener & Mason, 2009). A majority of the research has centered on creating a method and delivering life skills to the student athletes through student services departments within the college athletic departments.…”
Section: Community Service In Sportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The active participation in community service projects allows the local community stakeholders to acknowledgethe outreach efforts of the athletic department (Kihl et al, 2014). The primary participants in community service for the athletic department are student-athletes, as it provides them with added benefits in the classroom.…”
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I athletic departments are generating revenue that would place them in comparison with Forbes100 "Best Small Business" list (Badenhausen, 2014). Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the main issue that is investigated in this paper as it pertains to the actions of the Division I athletic departments. The Division I athletic departments are at the highest level in collegiate athletics based on the ability to offer more athletic scholarships to student athletes. CSR is the belief that a company should be a good citizen in society (Bowen, 2013). The paper will take a global perspective view of the CSR actions of athletic departments through a content analysis of the department's websites for the constructs: environmental sustainability, cause related marketing, and community service. The paper serves as means for understanding if athletic departments are conducting CSR, and is the first timea content analysishas been applied to the investigation of CSR actions. The paper submits that NCAA Division I athletic departments are taking CSR actions in support of the three constructs researched.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.