2022
DOI: 10.30958/ajha.9-3-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Emotional Impact of Environmental Artworks Using Q Methodology

Abstract: By engaging audience emotions, the creative arts can prompt people to consider societal issues in different ways and hence influence views and behaviours. While audience members bring their unique personal characteristics to the art experience, their emotional responses to art may be shared somewhat. To contribute to understanding audience emotional engagement, this empirical study investigates the emotional responses of viewers to an exhibition of environmental artworks. Q methodology is used with images to e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are also interindividual differences in individuals’ responsiveness to different types of aesthetic stimuli, regardless of culture (Afhami & Mohammadi-Zarghan, 2018; Belfi et al, 2018; Carlson et al, 2016; Chamorro-Premuzic et al, 2009; Fayn et al, 2015; Jacobsen, 2004; McManus & Furnham, 2006; Rentfrow et al, 2011). There is evidence to suggest that some people are simply more or less responsive to aesthetic stimuli in general (Brook, 2022; Diessner et al, 2020; Nelson, 1985; Saarikallio et al, 2013). Given the strong cultural impacts on what people like, it is reasonable to ask whether culture also impacts aesthetic responsiveness.…”
Section: The Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (Area)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also interindividual differences in individuals’ responsiveness to different types of aesthetic stimuli, regardless of culture (Afhami & Mohammadi-Zarghan, 2018; Belfi et al, 2018; Carlson et al, 2016; Chamorro-Premuzic et al, 2009; Fayn et al, 2015; Jacobsen, 2004; McManus & Furnham, 2006; Rentfrow et al, 2011). There is evidence to suggest that some people are simply more or less responsive to aesthetic stimuli in general (Brook, 2022; Diessner et al, 2020; Nelson, 1985; Saarikallio et al, 2013). Given the strong cultural impacts on what people like, it is reasonable to ask whether culture also impacts aesthetic responsiveness.…”
Section: The Aesthetic Responsiveness Assessment (Area)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also seems reasonable to suspect that had the touring exhibition not taking place during a pandemic situation, the attendance would have been higher. There are better ways of evaluating visitors' emotional responses to exhibitions than a written survey, including drawing/walking methods (Boyd & Hughes, 2020), focus groups and semi-structured interviews (Tischler, Carone, & Mistry, 2016), and Q-methodology (Brook, 2022). Methods like these give participants a greater chance of connecting with, exploring and communicating the cognitive and the visceral (bodily) dimensions of their emotional responses (Düringer, 2014).…”
Section: Media Promotion and Opening Nightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When people fail to perceive risk, they do not take action. The very nature of environmental destruction, especially climate change, is often abstract and time-delayed, which leads to a decreased perception of risk [ 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Even if we are successful at increasing concern about climate change, we may find that tactic to be ineffective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of individuals are turning to art to help raise public awareness of topics related to environmental destruction [ 40 , 41 , 47 , 48 ]. Art’s ability to evoke emotions while encouraging dialogue may serve as a powerful tool in communicating the importance of the environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation