Insects in Art during an Age of Environmental Turmoil

Abstract

Humans are reshaping the planet in impressive, and impressively self-destructive, ways. Evidence and awareness of our environmental impact has failed to elicit meaningful change in reversing our behavior. A multifaceted approach to communicating human-induced environmental destruction is critical, and art can affect our behavior by its power to evoke emotions. Artists often use insects in their works because of our intimate and varied relationship with this diverse, abundant lineage of animals. We surveyed work by 73 artists featuring insects or insect bodily products to gauge how extensively artists are addressing anthropogenic environmental distress, and what insects they are choosing as subjects in the process. Categories often cited as contributing to species extinction are (1) habitat destruction, (2) invasive species, (3) pollution, (4) human population, and (5) overharvesting. After adding insect-specific categories of (6) decline of insect pollinators and (7) the intentional modification or extermination of insects, we categorized our surveyed works, confirming categorizations with 53 of the living artists. Forty-seven percent of the artists addressed habitat destruction or climate change, but some other categories were severely underrepresented, with almost no work explicitly addressing overpopulation or overharvesting. Artists favored Hymenoptera (62%) over potentially more species-rich orders. Recognizing these biases could alert scientists, artists, and others to more effectively communicate messages of universal importance.

A world without bees: new insights from Australia for managing sustainability in a changing climate

“…Worldwide public interest in pollination and bee-related issues has been documented in a variety of movies, television shows, graffiti, formal art and on social media (Figure 1). There is long-term evidence of a close relationship between human culture and society and healthy bee management practices, which has persisted since ancient times (Klein & Brosius 2022;Prendergast et al 2021).…”

The Potential Risks of Genetically Altered Animals on the Environment

“…Genetically engineered animals examples are the cattle's, pigs, chickens, goats, ships, dogs, cats, rats, fishes and mice. Biodiversity of the environment affected by the genetically altered animals as overrunning of old species has been collapsing the existence of old species [1]. Independence of genetics acts of animals has harmed the environmental consequences that can decrease the potential of sustainability.…”