2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the efficacy of RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 direct approaches in comparison to RNA extraction

Abstract: Highlights The genetic identification of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is based on viral RNA extraction prior to RT-qPCR assay, however recent studies, using different buffers, support the elimination of the extraction step (direct approaches). We obtained similar limit of detection levels for SARS-CoV-2 when analyzing laboratory (non-clinical) samples using viral RNA extraction prior to RT-qPCR assay and direct approaches. However, in clinical or… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
23
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of RT-qPCR assay is estimated to be 1–10 PFU/mL at Ct ≤ 40, 14 , 15 which is significantly greater than that shown in our assay (∼10 4 PFU/mL). To enable effective COVID-19 diagnosis, the assay’s sensitivity needs to be improved; therefore, several virus enrichment processes were evaluated.…”
Section: Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The sensitivity of RT-qPCR assay is estimated to be 1–10 PFU/mL at Ct ≤ 40, 14 , 15 which is significantly greater than that shown in our assay (∼10 4 PFU/mL). To enable effective COVID-19 diagnosis, the assay’s sensitivity needs to be improved; therefore, several virus enrichment processes were evaluated.…”
Section: Results and Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…The sensitivity of RT-qPCR assay is estimated to 1-10 PFU/ml at Ct ≤40 14,15 , which is significantly greater than that shown in our assay (~10 4 PFU/ml). To enable effective COVID-19 diagnosis, the assay's sensitivity of the needs to be improved, therefore several virus enrichment processes were evaluated.…”
Section: Sample Processing For Sensitivity Improvementcontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…There have been recent advances in extraction-free protocols for COVID-19 amplification [154][155][156][157][158][159] and sequencing-based tests [160]. However, such protocols involve trade-offs between lower sensitivity and simplicity [22,161,162]. Automated extraction platforms utilizing liquid handling robots are useful for high-throughput, centralized COVID-19 diagnostic testing.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%