2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Specific and Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Identification Based on LC-MS/MS Analysis

Abstract: SARS-CoV-2, the etiologic agent of the COVID-19 pandemic, emerged as the cause of a global crisis. Rapid and reliable clinical diagnosis is essential for effectively controlling transmission. The gold standard assay for SARS-CoV-2 identification is the highly sensitive real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR); however, this assay depends on specialized reagents and may suffer from false results. Thus, additional assays based on different approaches could be beneficial. Here, we present a nove… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study by Schuster et al . a rapid SARS-CoV-2 identification was developed based on liquid chromatography-MS using six specific and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 peptide markers [ 46 ]. It is claimed that the assay can identify low concentration (10 4 PFU/ml) of SARS-CoV-2 in naïve nasopharyngeal swabs.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study by Schuster et al . a rapid SARS-CoV-2 identification was developed based on liquid chromatography-MS using six specific and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 peptide markers [ 46 ]. It is claimed that the assay can identify low concentration (10 4 PFU/ml) of SARS-CoV-2 in naïve nasopharyngeal swabs.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swab samples in the transfer media were directly applied to the MALDI-MS and results were analyzed by six different machine learning approaches and authors claimed to have results with high accuracy (93.9%), low false positive (7%), and false negative (5%) rates. In another study by Schuster et al a rapid SARS-CoV-2 identification was developed based on liquid chromatography-MS using six specific and sensitive SARS-CoV-2 peptide markers [46]. It is claimed that the assay can identify low concentration (10 4 PFU/ml) of SARS-CoV-2 in naïve nasopharyngeal swabs.…”
Section: Mass Spectrometry-based Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a study from our lab presented a rapid and reliable assay for SARS-CoV-2 identification based on specific markers derived from N and S SARS-CoV-2 proteins using high-resolution mass spectrometry. This assay enabled direct identification of 5 × 10 4 PFU/ml [ 29 ] SARS-CoV-2 in spiked buffer and an order of magnitude higher in NP specimens. These promising emerging MS-based methods are specific and rapid and may be beneficial as a research tool, or to supplement the diagnostic testing of COVID‐19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 6 13 The available data support the potential of LC-MS/MS to achieve >90% sensitivity and nearly 100% specificity when using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) testing as the benchmark. 6 , 10 , 13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%