2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effects of turf-replacement programs in Los Angeles

Abstract: Water utilities incentivize turf replacement to promote water conservation, but the effects of such programs have received limited evaluations. In 2014, the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) undertook an unprecedented investment to incentive turf replacement throughout Southern California in response to a serious Statewide drought. MWD devoted $350 million to the program, resulting in more than 46,000 rebate payments (25,000 in Los Angeles County) to remove 15.3 million square meters of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, another contributing factor to the landscapes of Los Angeles has been inexpensive and abundant water. Studies have shown that with higher water prices, drought messaging, and turf replacement rebate programs, residents reduce landscape water use and are willing to replace their lawns with plants that use less water (Pincetl et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, another contributing factor to the landscapes of Los Angeles has been inexpensive and abundant water. Studies have shown that with higher water prices, drought messaging, and turf replacement rebate programs, residents reduce landscape water use and are willing to replace their lawns with plants that use less water (Pincetl et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we evaluated the effectiveness of turf replacement programs in LA County through work funded by MWD. We examined participation trends in MWD's 2014-2016 turf replacement program and developed a landscape classification typology using openly-available imagery to evaluate changed landscapes (Pincetl et al 2018). The findings from this project provide important context to understand whether turf replacement programs can be a successful strategy for promote landscape change and outdoor conservation to reduce urban demand.…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cities of extreme climates generally have lower species richness of urban trees and lawn vegetation compared to milder climates (Jenerette et al, 2016;Padullés Cubino et al, 2018). Within lawn communities, these patterns may arise due to differences in irrigation practices across cities, as well as differences in turf varietals (Kendal et al, 2018;Pincetl et al, 2019). Cities in more arid climates, such as Los Angeles and Phoenix, irrigate their lawns, while more mesic cities have both irrigated and non-irrigated lawns (Wheeler et al, 2017).…”
Section: Taxonomic and Functional Diversity In Recreational Park Vegementioning
confidence: 99%