2019
DOI: 10.1002/ppp3.10067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban plant diversity in Los Angeles, California: Species and functional type turnover in cultivated landscapes

Abstract: Societal Impact Statement People plant, remove, and manage urban vegetation in cities for varying purposes and to varying extents. The direct manipulation of plants affects the benefits people receive from plants. In synthesizing several studies of urban biodiversity in Los Angeles, we find that cultivated plants differ from those in remnant natural areas. This highlights the importance of studying cultivated plants in cities, which is crucial for the design and planning of sustainable cities. Residents have c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
1
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
34
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In more mesic portions of the world, where native tree diversity is higher in locations adjacent to cities, relying more on native tree species that are suitable for urban environments (e.g., tolerance to air pollution; Grote et al 2016) may be an appropriate strategy when considering planting street trees (Jenerette et al 2016). However, this may not be optimal for a city such as LA, or other cities in arid regions of the world with relatively poor tree diversity in lowland areas outside the city boundaries (Avolio et al 2019). Thus, for many municipalities, nonnative street‐tree species likely need to be considered when thinking about a resilient urban forest canopy, which is a similar conclusion for cities elsewhere in the world (Sjöman et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In more mesic portions of the world, where native tree diversity is higher in locations adjacent to cities, relying more on native tree species that are suitable for urban environments (e.g., tolerance to air pollution; Grote et al 2016) may be an appropriate strategy when considering planting street trees (Jenerette et al 2016). However, this may not be optimal for a city such as LA, or other cities in arid regions of the world with relatively poor tree diversity in lowland areas outside the city boundaries (Avolio et al 2019). Thus, for many municipalities, nonnative street‐tree species likely need to be considered when thinking about a resilient urban forest canopy, which is a similar conclusion for cities elsewhere in the world (Sjöman et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vegetation in the urbanized areas experiences variable growing conditions throughout the year, depending on irrigation patterns, planting practices, and geographic position in the city. For example, there are over 1,000 species of nonnative plants throughout LA (Avolio et al 2019), and each likely has unique phenological patterns that may influence bird‐feeding behavior (Appendix ). Patterns of precipitation and temperature are also highly variable throughout the region (yearly averages: 19°C/13°C high and low temperatures and 379 mm precipitation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex urban legacies that arise from both the ecological system and the coupled social and technological system and their interactions deserve closer investigation. For example, human factors can influence horticulture and landscaping resulting in preferences of the past influencing current vegetation composition and structure (Ossola et al, 2019;Avolio et al, 2020). In addition, the spatial spread of tree diseases such as Dutch Elm disease through a population of urban trees is influences by the spatial distribution of that species.…”
Section: Legacies Priming and Time-skippingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given their high land cover, residential yards have been proposed to play a role in conservation of biodiversity in cities (Goddard et al, 2010;Lerman and Warren, 2011). Indeed, plant diversity in residential yards is often higher than in surrounding natural ecosystems (Pearse et al, 2018;Avolio et al, 2019b). While cultivated urban plant biodiversity is controlled, to an extent, by traditional ecological drivers such as climate (Jenerette et al, 2016;Padullés Cubino et al, 2019b;Pearse et al, 2018) and space availability (van Heezik et al, 2014;Padullés Cubino et al, 2019b), it is also shaped by residents' preferences and management activities, which may be influenced by their learned experience and social norms (Roy Chowdhury et al, 2011;Cook et al, 2012;Politi Bertoncini et al, 2012;Avolio et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%