2009
DOI: 10.1080/10508410902766192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Effects of Dimensionality in Advanced Avionic Display Concepts for Synthetic Vision Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(30 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because SVS displays are designed to address CFIT, they must support accurate pilot SpA (Bolton et al, 2007). Our study demonstrated that SVS-enabled developments in high-level spatial representations were superior to those developed without SVS, suggesting that SVS seems to be advantageous, as already shown in several studies on SpA (Alexander et al, 2009; Bolton et al, 2007; Hughes & Glaab, 2007). As seen through their use in our study, spatial representations showed promise as an SpA-level indicator, yet none of our results nor those of existing studies could point to the potential parallel between SpA levels and SpK levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because SVS displays are designed to address CFIT, they must support accurate pilot SpA (Bolton et al, 2007). Our study demonstrated that SVS-enabled developments in high-level spatial representations were superior to those developed without SVS, suggesting that SVS seems to be advantageous, as already shown in several studies on SpA (Alexander et al, 2009; Bolton et al, 2007; Hughes & Glaab, 2007). As seen through their use in our study, spatial representations showed promise as an SpA-level indicator, yet none of our results nor those of existing studies could point to the potential parallel between SpA levels and SpK levels.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Similarly, numerous metrics have been employed among SVS-based studies showing that although benefits from SVS are observed, they are often design dependent (i.e., the 2D perspective display by SVS can induce spatial biases affecting SpA; Wickens, 2002b). Performance measures have included traffic location judgment (Alexander et al, 2009), the number of correct identifications of images made when matching a video of the actual terrain to SVS displays (Schnell & Lemos, 2002), the reproduction of highlighted terrain points from a blank SVS display on an out-the-window display (Alexander, Wickens, & Hardy, 2005), and both the detection and anticipation of CFIT incidents (Arthur et al, 2004; Hughes & Glaab, 2007; Uhlarik, Peterson, & Herold, 1998). Overall, as noted by Bolton et al (2007), these studies did not directly address any of three levels of SpA defined by Wickens, nor the L-R-S levels of SpK.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there exist other instruments providing information about roll, such as multifunction display panels in advanced aircrafts (e.g.,Alexander, Prinzel, Arthur, & Bailey, 2009). For the sake of clarity, we restrict our discussion to the two basic versions of the attitude indicator.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%