2011
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.595372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the effect of snow and ice melt in an Alpine headwater catchment and further downstream in the River Rhine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First of all, in many mountainous and high mountain regions, the seasonal 20 snowpack contributes a major portion of the water budget. With a contribution of up to 50 % and more to the annual discharge, snow melt plays a key role in the dynamic of the hydrology of catchments of various high mountain areas such as the Himalayas (e.g., Jeelani et al, 2012), the Alps (e.g., Junghans et al, 2011) and the Norwegian mountains (e.g., Engelhardt et al, 2014), and is thus an equally important contributor to stream flow generation as rain in these affected areas. Furthermore, timing investigating the impact of LAISI on the snow melt and runoff predominantly use empirical formulations to investigate the impact of LAISI on the radiative forcing in snow, by observing the net surface shortwave fluxes over snow and identifying the contribution from the LAISI through determination of the (hypothetical) clean snow albedo (e.g., Painter et al, 2007;Skiles et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, in many mountainous and high mountain regions, the seasonal 20 snowpack contributes a major portion of the water budget. With a contribution of up to 50 % and more to the annual discharge, snow melt plays a key role in the dynamic of the hydrology of catchments of various high mountain areas such as the Himalayas (e.g., Jeelani et al, 2012), the Alps (e.g., Junghans et al, 2011) and the Norwegian mountains (e.g., Engelhardt et al, 2014), and is thus an equally important contributor to stream flow generation as rain in these affected areas. Furthermore, timing investigating the impact of LAISI on the snow melt and runoff predominantly use empirical formulations to investigate the impact of LAISI on the radiative forcing in snow, by observing the net surface shortwave fluxes over snow and identifying the contribution from the LAISI through determination of the (hypothetical) clean snow albedo (e.g., Painter et al, 2007;Skiles et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They will be even intensified by increased potential evaporation in a warmer climate. On the scale of the European Alps this is expected to have regional (Horton et al, 2006) to transnational impacts (Bradley, 2006;Junghans et al, 2010) on irrigation and agriculture, the biosphere and shipping traffic on major streams. The glacier discharge peak is shifted from early August to end of May.…”
Section: Future Runoffmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many mountain regions, the seasonal snowpack constitutes a major portion of the water budget, contributing up to 50 %, and even more, to the annual discharge (e.g. Junghans et al, 2011). Snowmelt plays a key role in the dynamic of the hydrology of catchments of various high mountain areas such as the Himalayas (Jeelani et al, 2012), the Alps (Junghans et al, 2011), and the Norwegian mountains (Engelhardt et al, 2014), and is an equally important contributor to streamflow generation as rain in these areas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Junghans et al, 2011). Snowmelt plays a key role in the dynamic of the hydrology of catchments of various high mountain areas such as the Himalayas (Jeelani et al, 2012), the Alps (Junghans et al, 2011), and the Norwegian mountains (Engelhardt et al, 2014), and is an equally important contributor to streamflow generation as rain in these areas. Furthermore, timing and magnitude of the snowmelt are major predictors for flood (Berghuijs et al, 2016) and landslide (Kawagoe et al, 2009) forecasts, and important factors in water resource management and operational hydropower forecasting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%