2016
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/37/1/012013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the Effect of Global Positioning System (GPS) Satellite Clock Error via GPS Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Along the three orthogonal directions, the decomposition of the ephemeris error is carried out. Root sum square value of the clock error and line of sight of ephemeris error contributes to the range error of errors in clock and ephemeris [22], [28], [29].…”
Section: Control System Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along the three orthogonal directions, the decomposition of the ephemeris error is carried out. Root sum square value of the clock error and line of sight of ephemeris error contributes to the range error of errors in clock and ephemeris [22], [28], [29].…”
Section: Control System Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The satellite data for satellite clock offsets and orbits are given in a broadcast message that is taken by the GNSS receivers. The satellite clock offsets have errors (10 ns) [23,24]. However, the effect of satellite clock errors is equal to the rover, which is also the case for the reference station.…”
Section: Signal Obstructions and Multipathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a single reference station that has a baseline length "r," a satellite orbit error "e 0 " at an R distance to the satellites yields an error in the estimated position, ep, of approximately: ep = e 0 * r/R, which might be derived from the Taylor expansion. For broadcast orbits employed in RTK, it may be accepted that the orbit error is 2 m) [23,24]. If the distance between the reference and the rover is r = 50 − 100 km and R = 20 000 km, we have 5-10 mm errors because of satellite orbits.…”
Section: Signal Obstructions and Multipathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the above limitations, the need to develop a calibration methodology is evident, for vehicle speed measurement GNSS-based instrumentation, to be able to use calibration standards that can grant measurement traceability covered by the CIPM MRA. Some proposal to calibrate or to test the speed measured by GNSS receivers have been made in References [23][24][25][26][27][28], but the determination of a calibration method to be able to grant the desired CMC in a wide speed range, considering all the measurement uncertainties contribution is still missing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this work is to analyze the suitability of an experimental calibration method for GNSS speed measurement systems. Among all the solutions presented in References [23][24][25][26][27][28], in this paper, the attention is focused on the calibration methodology presented in References [23,24] and is based on the use of two pairs of photocells on a track together with a frequency counter and a synchronization system. Considering all the measurement uncertainty contribution, a sensitive analysis has been made in order to understand the limits and/or the applicability of this calibration methodology in a speed range from 1 to 300 km/h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%