2022
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263390
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the detection ability of a range of epistasis detection methods on simulated data for pure and impure epistatic models

Abstract: Background Numerous approaches have been proposed for the detection of epistatic interactions within GWAS datasets in order to better understand the drivers of disease and genetics. Methods A selection of state-of-the-art approaches were assessed. These included the statistical tests, fast-epistasis, BOOST, logistic regression and wtest; swarm intelligence methods, namely AntEpiSeeker, epiACO and CINOEDV; and data mining approaches, including MDR, GSS, SNPRuler and MPI3SNP. Data were simulated to provide ran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, a larger MAF at SNP1 or SNP2 also increased the power. Moreover, the vQTL method is also capable of detecting “pure epistasis” (without individual SNP main effects) ( Russ et al, 2022 ), as demonstrated by Figures 1 , 2C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, a larger MAF at SNP1 or SNP2 also increased the power. Moreover, the vQTL method is also capable of detecting “pure epistasis” (without individual SNP main effects) ( Russ et al, 2022 ), as demonstrated by Figures 1 , 2C .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…I considered two situations, as follows, (I) Without SNP main effects: By specifying (scenario 1), I evaluated the type I error rates given the significance level of 3.6E-10. To demonstrate that this method is also capable of detecting “pure epistasis” (no individual SNP main effects) ( Russ et al, 2022 ), power was assessed at and . Because the four SNPs were, in turn, regarded as SNP2, the power was evaluated under scenarios 2–5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ren et al (2018) established a predictive model for the scope of caved rock zones (CRZs) concerning the varying laws of lateral pressure and forecasted the CRZ scope using a caving mining method. Based on modified parameters in a traditional probability integral model, (Russ et al, 2022) established a subsidence prediction model.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MAPIT can be used as a way to screen for all loci that have significant marginal epistastic effects for subsequent tests to see which pairs of loci may be involved in epistasis. More comprehensive recent surveys on epistasis are offered by Ogbunugafor and Scarpino on higher order epistasis [33], Niel et al on statistical and computational challenges of varied approaches [34], and Russ et al for performance comparison of June 2, 2023 3/39 many varied epistasis detection methods [35].…”
Section: Computational Challenges In Detecting Epistasismentioning
confidence: 99%