2022
DOI: 10.1111/add.16088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating the causal effect of tobacco smoking on white matter brain aging: a two‐sample Mendelian randomization analysis in UK Biobank

Abstract: Background and Aims: Tobacco smoking is a risk factor for impaired brain function, but its causal effect on white matter brain aging remains unclear. This study aimed to measure the causal effect of tobacco smoking on white matter brain aging.Design: Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis using two non-overlapping data sets (with and without neuroimaging data) from UK Biobank (UKB). The group exposed to smoking and control group consisted of current smokers and never smokers, respectively. Our main method was g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the signal-to-noise ratio in BrainAGE is low, this may lead to some false positive results. Therefore, we included some non-IDPs that have been repeatedly identified in BrainAGE studies, such as diastolic blood pressure [ 13 , 40 , 41 ], systolic blood pressure [ 42 , 43 , 44 ], alcohol intake [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], a diabetes diagnosis [ 48 , 49 , 50 ], and smoking status [ 51 , 52 , 53 ], in the comparison to observe the model’s interpretability of these typical findings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the signal-to-noise ratio in BrainAGE is low, this may lead to some false positive results. Therefore, we included some non-IDPs that have been repeatedly identified in BrainAGE studies, such as diastolic blood pressure [ 13 , 40 , 41 ], systolic blood pressure [ 42 , 43 , 44 ], alcohol intake [ 45 , 46 , 47 ], a diabetes diagnosis [ 48 , 49 , 50 ], and smoking status [ 51 , 52 , 53 ], in the comparison to observe the model’s interpretability of these typical findings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WM BAG was calculated by subtracting individuals' chronological age from their predicted brain age. The age-dependent bias has been noted to distort clinical interpretation in many brain age prediction studies [46][47][48]. We used a simple linear regression model [49] to remove brain age prediction bias from WM BAG and evaluated the performance of our correction method by the MAE.…”
Section: Age Bias Corrected White Matter (Wm) Brain Age Gap (Bag)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then applied the generalized inverse-variance weighted (gen-IVW) approach to estimate the causal effect of BP (i.e., SBP/DBP) on WM BAG using the previously selected valid IVs. The gen-IVW approach in MR analysis took the ratio of gene-outcome association and geneexposure association estimates and combined multiple independent IVs into an overall estimate to assess the causal effect of exposure on the outcome while controlling the impact from LD between pairs of genetic variants [48,53]. BH method was used to adjust for multiple comparisons in evaluating the causal effect of each BP on BAG.…”
Section: Estimating Causal Effect By Two-sample Mendelian Randomizati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selection of a brain aging indicator is essential. Recent studies highlight the efficacy of advanced machine learning techniques applied to neuroimaging data, offering the age-adjusted BAG estimates with minimal predictive biases (16,17) proven to be linked to physical and brain health (9,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22). The single scalar metric BAG is a robust and easily interpretable outcome, simplifying the challenges of handling multiple variables and addressing dependencies typically encountered in complex multivariate brain imaging models (7,8,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%