2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating surface deformation and near surface strain hardening resulting from shot peening a tempered martensitic steel and application to low cycle fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main monotonic tensile properties of the materials are shown in Table 1. The other mechanical properties, microstructure and composition of this material have been detailed in [21]. In this study, a U-notched specimen (stress concentration factor, = 1.58) representing the fir tree root geometry of a turbine blade has been used.…”
Section: Materials and Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main monotonic tensile properties of the materials are shown in Table 1. The other mechanical properties, microstructure and composition of this material have been detailed in [21]. In this study, a U-notched specimen (stress concentration factor, = 1.58) representing the fir tree root geometry of a turbine blade has been used.…”
Section: Materials and Specimenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have systematically studied the residual stress relaxation behaviour in shot-peened specimens during fatigue loading both experimentally and numerically [2,6,7,11,15,16,[21][22][23]. It was found that the residual stress distribution generally reached a stabilised state after a logarithmic relaxation process during fatigue loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the T0 shot peened case, it is clear that the microhardness has increased significantly and this layer extends to around 350 μm beneath the surface. It should be noted that the extent of the strain hardened layer and the compressive residual stress distributions have also been determined for these two conditions via X-ray diffraction in previous studies [31,34] and the extent of both the strain hardened layer and the sub-surface zone of the residual compressive stress are greater in the T0 condition, and the maximum depth of the compressive residual stress zone also extends to ~350 μm beneath the surface. It seems likely therefore that microhardness evaluations are affected by both the strain hardened layer and the compressive residual stress zone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A full description of the fatigue sample and experiment details have been provided in previous publications [31,[34][35][36] and the relevant details are reported here only briefly. The material in this study is a steam turbine blade material, FV448, a ferritic heat resistant steel with a tempered martensitic microstructure.…”
Section: Materials and Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation