2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating Single-incision Slings in Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: The Usefulness of the CONSORT Statement Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One such study compared abstracts from high-impact medical journals to the corresponding full-text article and found numerous errors and/or omissions [5], which is consistent with more recent studies [12]. Eurthermore, numerous studies have assessed the quality or accuracy of different specialty journals outside the medical profession [11,[13][14][15][19][20][21][22], including pharmacy journals [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…One such study compared abstracts from high-impact medical journals to the corresponding full-text article and found numerous errors and/or omissions [5], which is consistent with more recent studies [12]. Eurthermore, numerous studies have assessed the quality or accuracy of different specialty journals outside the medical profession [11,[13][14][15][19][20][21][22], including pharmacy journals [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Overall, 49 participants have successfully completed the study (EG n = 28; CG n = 21). The randomized control trials (RCT) reporting quality have been improved using the CONSORT statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) (Figure 1) [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, 111 women aged 45 to 78 (mean 68.77) successfully completed the study (PFMT (EG1) was n � 40 aged 60 to 78 (mean 70.12), ExMI (EG2) was n � 37 aged 45 to 76 (mean 66.71), and CG was n � 34 aged 60 to 78 (mean 69.79)). Applying the CONSORT statement (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) ( Figure 1) allowed the authors to improve the RCT reporting quality [7]. Prior to the treatment, subjects provided information on the contraindications to the treatment, circumstances of urine loss, and any comorbid conditions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%