2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aej.2020.04.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluating RBF methods for solving PDEs using Padua points distribution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we consider the collocation points in the Chebyshev-type scheme, which is generated in the interval (−1, 1), instead of the traditional uniformly distributed source points. e novelty of the idea lies in that the computational cost remains the same as traditional way with more accurate solutions and there is no need to consider the fictitious points used in the other methods [13][14][15][16]. e definite generation of collocation points on each direction of the physical domain by Chebyshev-type is shown as follows:…”
Section: The Crbf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we consider the collocation points in the Chebyshev-type scheme, which is generated in the interval (−1, 1), instead of the traditional uniformly distributed source points. e novelty of the idea lies in that the computational cost remains the same as traditional way with more accurate solutions and there is no need to consider the fictitious points used in the other methods [13][14][15][16]. e definite generation of collocation points on each direction of the physical domain by Chebyshev-type is shown as follows:…”
Section: The Crbf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e novelty of the Chebyshev-type scheme lies in that the computational cost remains the same as traditional way with more accurate solutions, and there is no need to consider the fictitious points used in the other methods [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where w i is the i-th weight coefficient, and ϕ(r) = ϕ x i − x is the basic function determined by the Euclidean distance between the prescribed observed point x i and the untried point x [19,37,38]. To determine the weight coefficient w i , a set of interpolation points of x j that have known results from CFD simulations are introduced to substitute the untried points of x, where all the interpolation points should satisfy:…”
Section: Optimization Of Aerodynamic Performance In Ducted Multi-propeller Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the optimal observed points are determined in the vicinity of the interpolation points correspondingly, in a manner of random selection. The Inverse Multiquadric (IMQ) function is adopted through trial-and-error from multiple basic function options in the RBFs model [19,37,38] and utilized in Equation ( 3), which is capable of providing reasonable results in approximating the lift force at all points, and is defined as:…”
Section: Optimization Of Aerodynamic Performance In Ducted Multi-propeller Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation