Evaluating quality of care for patients with rotator cuff disorders

Abstract

BackgroundMeasuring quality in healthcare is vital in evaluating patient outcomes and system performance. The availability of reliable and valid information about the quality of care for patients presenting with rotator cuff disorders (RCD) in Alberta, Canada is scarce. The objective of this study is to measure quality of care for patients with RCD in order to identify areas of improvement.MethodsThis study employs descriptive survey research design. Between March 2015 and November 2016, a convenience sample of patients presenting with chronic, full-thickness rotator cuff tears to two sport medicine centres in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta completed two questionnaires: the Healthcare Access and Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (HAPSQ) and the Rotator Cuff Quality-of-Life Index (RC-QOL). Data collected using both questionnaires were used to make judgments about quality of care. Quality of care was evaluated using six dimensions of quality defined by the Alberta Quality Matrix for Health: accessibility, acceptability, efficiency, effectiveness, appropriateness, and safety. Data was also used to compare current patient clinical pathways to ideal clinical pathway algorithms and used to make judgments about the appropriateness and safety of healthcare practices.ResultsOne hundred seventy-one patients participated in the study. The longest mean waiting times for medical services in Alberta were for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) received in the public sector (103 days) and consultation by orthopaedic surgeon (172 days). Patient satisfaction with respect to quality of care was lowest for emergency room physician and highest for orthopaedic surgeon visits. Patients were treated by a mean of 2.5 physicians (SD: 0.77, range: 2–7). The total aggregate average cost per patient was $4541.19. The mean RC-QOL score for all patients was 42 (SD: 22). Only 54 patients (64%) requiring surgery were able to consult with a surgeon within benchmark timeframes. A comparison of current to ideal clinical pathway algorithms found that 38 patients (22%) experienced indirect clinical pathways, whereby care was fragmented and patients received care from multiple and often, redundant healthcare professionals.ConclusionThere is a discrepancy between current and ideal clinical pathways whereby some patients are experiencing quality of care that is inefficient, disjointed, and less than ideal.

‘Down to the person, the individual patient themselves’: A qualitative study of treatment decision‐making for shoulder pain

“…Furthermore, our findings highlight the disparity between the private and public health systems in relation to expedient access to treatment, inappropriate referral and access to treatment incongruous with evidence‐based treatment hierarchy. Such inappropriate specialist referrals and underutilization of appropriate treatment for rotator cuff disorders have been described elsewhere 45 …”

Validation of a tool to assess patient satisfaction, waiting times, healthcare utilization, and cost

“…Although an ICC of 0.60 was below the cut-off value of 0.70, there were no other sources of information available to extract patient utilization with respect to out-of-pocket expenses incurred while suffering RCD. Therefore, this item was retained and used in subsequent analyses (Eubank et al ., 2018). Date of surgery possessed an ICC of 1.0.…”

Health Satisfaction in Health Care between Patients of 3rd Tertiary Allergy Center in Kirkuk with Salam Primary Health Care Center Patients in Kirkuk

“…Quality measurement is a key issue in healthcare systems for assessing health system performance and desired outcomes for patients (11) . Assessment of patient satisfaction is vital, because patient satisfaction reflects the gap between the expected and received health service, being the result of health care and an indicator of treatment use and commitment to the care and support provided (12) .…”